Lightroom vs Aperture vs Capture One Pro
PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
 

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photography Forum > Tools Of the Trade > Computers and Software

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2008   #1
Llama
 
Location: TX
Posts: 522
CamelKarma: 80
Editing OK?: Ask First
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Lightroom vs Aperture vs Capture One Pro

I just downloaded the free 30 day trial of Capture One Pro. Which incidentally is the most expensive of the 3 and has the least amount of features.

I've done a few tests over the last couple of days and C1 seems to consistently give better results. Sharper, cleaner images with better tonal range. I've tried applying just minor tweaks in each software and I've tried not applying anything... just exporting to photoshop. Either way I get the same results.

Has anyone else compared the three and ended up with the same findings?

__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register for your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
d2creative is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008   #2
Photocamel Master
 
brian.austin's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 7,875
CamelKarma: 10673
Editing OK?: Ask first
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Lightroom vs Aperture vs Capture One Pro

Nope.

I run a PC so Aperture was out. I was looking for much more than a RAW converter (I use the Collections to Web Gallery to publish workflow quite a bit) so I settled on LR.

Make sure that you're comparing LR's latest version of 1.3.1 to the others. I don't know what the trial version is.
__________________
Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas
brian.austin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008   #3
Llama
 
Location: TX
Posts: 522
CamelKarma: 80
Editing OK?: Ask First
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Lightroom vs Aperture vs Capture One Pro

Yeah, i have the latest full versions of all except for aperture 2.0.
Only CP is a trial version and it is the latest.
d2creative is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008   #4
PhotoCamel Supporter DONATED
Administrator
 
Mr. Pickles's Avatar
 
Location: Old Folks Home
Posts: 23,274
CamelKarma: 6968994
Editing OK?: Ask First
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Lightroom vs Aperture vs Capture One Pro

Not having a Mac, I never tried Aperture. The latest version of it is discussed by Raist and others in our own four-thirds forum. They like the newest quite a bit.

I heard a lot of people (Nikonians mostly) say great things about Capture One Pro, but they did complain about their "slowness' to update and the price.

Like Brian, I use Lightroom. I have used it since its beta form. I didn't like the beta as well as RSP, but it grew on me and once I saw a couple things from RSP make it into LR, it got a bit better. The latest version is heaps better than the beta was. I actually like LR quite a bit. It does a lot of stuff and it isn't that hard to figure out (but it isn't easy, either).
__________________
Olympus Full-time User
Olympus Passion Magazine
Idiot Savant AND trouble-maker...

PhotoCamel Helpful Info....
Posting Images Tutorial ... Posting and Critiquing? ... What's Camel Karma?
Mr. Pickles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008   #5
Llama
 
Location: TX
Posts: 522
CamelKarma: 80
Editing OK?: Ask First
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Lightroom vs Aperture vs Capture One Pro

Yeah, i agree. Lightroom is the awesome, and so is Aperture. I've been using Lightroom since the first beta and Aperture since it's first release. No doubt they are great packages with tons of time savers and features that are worth their weight in gold. C1 is not very intuitive at all and it is very basic in comparison. Heck, it's downright confusing.

But what I'm speaking to here is their raw conversion engines. For whatever reason, C1 is giving better results. All the other adjustments that aperture and lightroom offer can be done in photoshop if you know what you are doing. So if you strip them down and look at just their raw conversion, this is were I'm seeing a difference. Right now I'm wishing I could take the raw conversion of C1 and throw it into one of the other two to make the best all around package.
d2creative is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008   #6
PhotoCamel Supporter DONATED
Administrator
 
Mr. Pickles's Avatar
 
Location: Old Folks Home
Posts: 23,274
CamelKarma: 6968994
Editing OK?: Ask First
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Lightroom vs Aperture vs Capture One Pro

I think that for a lot of people, and I mentioned Nikon shooters before, it does have a nice RAW Engine. I believe some Olympus shooters liked it and the conversions also.

I think it is a balancing act. Form, fit, function vs the end result. I find it hard to believe that with LR or Aperture that you can't get any image look you could with other RAW converters. But I can see, have seen, that some are easier to get there than others.

I like LR's ability to save presets because once you use it and figure out what works best for your tastes and images, you can save a preset and apply it to images on upload. That gives a good starting point for your post processing work.

Still, the best and easiest to get "manufacturer recommended images" come from their own software, but it comes with a price in less features, speed, or other things.
__________________
Olympus Full-time User
Olympus Passion Magazine
Idiot Savant AND trouble-maker...

PhotoCamel Helpful Info....
Posting Images Tutorial ... Posting and Critiquing? ... What's Camel Karma?
Mr. Pickles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008   #7
PhotoCamel Supporter DONATED
Camel Breath
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 10,883
CamelKarma: 1099193
Editing OK?: No
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Lightroom vs Aperture vs Capture One Pro

I used to be really high on Capture One LE and the files it gave me; the cleanliness was unreal compared to other RAW converters I was using (namely, ACR and Nikon Capture NX). At lower ISOs, however, the difference wasn't nearly as pronounced. I was a big fan of Capture One's speed over other software at the time, but the gap's gone now.

Capture One ended up falling behind, and with the addition of Photo Mechanic it really didn't fit into my new workflow. With the newer cameras, I find Nikon Capture NX to produce the best file, though I'm working in RAW less and less...

Never have been a big fan of Aperture; I was thought it seemed to have more style in it than substance as a RAW converter, with the magnifying glass and all that.


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register for your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photography Forum > Tools Of the Trade > Computers and Software »


Share this topic:

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phase One's Capture One Pro 3.7.8 is out W.Smith Computers and Software 0 02-08-2008 08:01 AM
Slideshow Pro for Lightroom released brian.austin Image Editing 4 12-05-2007 04:11 PM
Aperture... garrentee Photography Talk 22 09-28-2007 12:05 PM
Capture One Pro/Phase One Pro mgerdes Fuji 5 05-23-2007 09:14 PM
Aperture Paul Shields Computers and Software 5 10-20-2005 10:22 PM