How to critique photos
PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
Photos of the Week Photos of the Week
 

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photography Forum > Tools Of the Trade > Tutorials

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2014   #1
F1 Camel
 
Tat2Duck's Avatar
 
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 2,505
CamelKarma: 6617978
Editing OK?: No
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default How to critique photos

The biggest and most popular part of PhotoCamel are the critique boards. Just about every subject and type of photography is addressed. The reason for its popularity is the undeclared value it has to those who take advantage of them. If you are serious about your photography a well executed critique becomes an invaluable tool. It is a mirror that reflects both your strong points and your weaknesses and, like a mirror, you need to be willing to accept all your weaknesses no matter how hard it is to hear.

Having someone critique your work can be a hard blow to the ego. If you are overly sensitive about your work you may want to reconsider. However, keep in mind that the members making these observation only know you from what you post. They react to a request and will offer an opinion based on their level of experience and expertise. DO NOT take anything that is said about your work to heart. Instead work on separating yourself from your image and try to look at it from their perspective. After all, they are looking at your work with fresh, unbiased eyes.

Keep in mind that critiques are given in a written format. As you know, intentions are not transmitted easily through the written word and often what someone writes can be easily misinterpreted. If you are writing a critique mind your grammar and choose your wording carefully. You wouldn't want to inadvertently piss someone off by what you write. You also don't want to get banned because of a comment you post. With that in mind, remember that others may have the same problem and what they write may come across in a way they did not intend it to be. Take what is written with a grain of salt. You don't have to agree with everything people write, it is a learning tool only.

Definition
Quote:
Criticism: (n.) the expression of disapproval of someone or something based on perceived faults or mistakes; the analysis and judgment of the merits and faults of a literary or artistic work.
Snapshot_02.jpg

Why is giving and taking criticism so hard?
Photography is personal. It tends to be a reflection of how the photographer sees the world. Often that vision is taken further by adding an interpretation of the scene through various editing processes. In the end, a good photograph is considered a creation born out of love. There is an emotional tie. That bond causes the photographer to be protective of their creation, but it also goes deeper, they are protecting their egos. A good critique exposes weaknesses and no one likes to admit their failings.

As the creator, photographers tend to get so close to their work they fail to see the big picture; art is subjective. They work on an image, shaping it into something self satisfying, looking to present some message to the world. When that world views their work and derives a different message it can be a hard slap to the face. It is human nature to defend our choices, wanting to force something that others may not see, not realizing that the alternative can also be enriching.

Part of learning to become a better photographer is to realize that once you release an image to the public, it is no longer yours. I don’t mean yours in the form of legal ownership. I’m talking about that emotional connection, that link that forms from experiences when we first view a scene. When a viewer first sees an image it is compared to what they have seen, felt and explored in their own past because that is what they have access to. They definitely can not access what is in the photographer’s head therefore the creator does not factor into their interpretation of an image. As that creator you have to be willing to let that take place and accept where that image goes.

Objective vs subjective information
Quote:
Objective: (adj.) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Subjective: (adj.) based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
Because photography, specially great photography, strike those proverbial emotional chords a good critic needs to be able to separate the emotional from the technical; objective from the subjective. Once separated a more constructive criticism can be assembled and presented to the reviewee. That doesn’t disqualify the subjective, rather it objectifies it into a more constructive format. While that may sound like an oxymoron it is meant to avoid unproductive comments such as, “I like it,” and, “that's pretty!” These types of subjective criticisms don’t benefit the person presenting their work for critique and should be avoided. Instead, explain why you "like" it or what elements define it as "pretty".

4 standard criteria for critique
Analyzing an image for criticism can follow a simple and fairly standardized format. This section explains four standard criteria for critiquing an image. These four are based on well documented standards and work to get the photographer to a more natural conclusion, advancing their ability. Each step progresses from the obvious to the more refined. To what level you take each section depends on your ability to see various aspects of a photograph; from technical to artistic aspects.

Too often I hear people say they can't offer a good critique because of one reason or another. “I'm just a beginner,” or, “I'm not a photographer,” tend to be the more common ones. Let me allay your fears. If you can formulate an opinion you can do a critique, so long as you are honest with yourself and the photographer whose work you are critiquing. To help you out here are the four criteria;
  1. Describe: This is a literal description of the elements and action in the image. No deep insight needed here, just a flat objective description of the image contents. Often this is for self education and not verbalized in the critique. It is just a tool that helps you get an understanding of what you are looking at. Verbalizing the description often helps.

    This process introduces you to the image. Here is where you identify the subject and supporting elements. Pay attention to colors, shapes, angles, people, textures, light and even editing styles and effects. The goal is to be as objective as possible. Describe the subject and its setting without inferring emotion, that comes later.

  2. Analyze: Here is where your knowledge of photography fundamentals come into play. Use the elements and principles of photography to reflect upon the image. Start with the basics then move to more advanced technical qualities. Take note of such things as exposure, depth of field, composition, framing, contrast, color balance, focal length, posing.

    Once the simple things are analyzed progress to more advanced observations such as the use of leading lines or light to draw the eye to a specific spot, or how colors are used to engage the viewer. With portraits it can be a matter of how far a face is turned or how a hand is presented. You are only limited by your own experience but the best thing about a critique is you also learn from reading what others post.

  3. Interpret: Here is where you begin to be more subjective in your analysis. It is no longer about how an image is created but why it was created. The best way to assess this is by asking yourself some questions. Here are some examples;
    • “What is the photographer trying to say through this image and why?” You are trying to discover the story within the image (if there is one), whether it is implied or un-implied. There are usually visual cues to help determine this. All photos have a story, but not all stories are deep and meaningful. Sometimes, “I am a pretty flower!” is the story and it doesn't need to go further than that.
    • “What is the implied style or historical reference of the photo?” This one can be tricky as it requires some knowledge of past trends and photographic techniques. This is useful considering many of today’s editing software have the ability to replicate many of photography’s past analog processes.
    • “What is the emotional appeal?” Since you can not know what the photographer had in mind when an image was created, you can not really know the true meaning behind why an image was created. You have to rely on clues in the image itself. “What am I supposed to be feeling when I view this image?”
    • “Do I connect with the image and why or why not?” Expanding on the emotional appeal, here you are want to do an introspective analysis of your emotional connection to the image. It can be anything from subject matter to a processing technique. Revealing this kind of information allows the photographer to judge how his image is received by others, specially if the emotional response matches the emotional appeal.
      Remember that just because an image receives a negative reaction from people does not mean that it was not the original intention of the photographer. Photography can be used to elicit all manner of emotions from the viewer, warm and fuzzy to horror and disgust.
    • “Why was the photo presented in this particular style?” Photo processing is a major part of presentation which ties in very closely with intention. A great photograph can be killed with bad editing and vice versa. It can be very easy to get lost in the technicalities of editing that the critic overlooks whether the initial style was the correct choice for a particular subject. Don't forget that lighting, makeup, costuming, perspective and set dressing also help to create a particular style as well. All these elements should be working in harmony with each other.

  4. Evaluate: After collecting all the above information about the photograph, do your best to determine how successfully the photograph met those criteria. Does it accomplish what the photographer was trying to present? If not, what areas need addressing and why?

    This is the hard part, writing it all down. If you follow the steps presented above you should have a fairly decent understanding of what needs to be addressed. It helps to create some bullet points in order to keep track of all the key issues. Just remember that you are addressing someone with an emotional tie to the work. Point out some strengths as well as the faults. Probably more so as strengths are hard to self analyze. Finally, offer suggestions on how the photographer can improve. Don't just say something is broken without offering a way to fix it or, at the very least, explaining why you think it’s broken.
Remember earlier I made mention critiquing to your ability and being honest about it. Sometimes a problem is so obvious that it stands out. While it can be very obvious you may not know the solution and that is okay too. It could be a problem that was missed and the photographer might already have the abilities to correct it or someone else may add to the conversation with suitable solution.

The takeaway here is to be honest but be polite, be subjective but also be objective and lastly, be constructive not destructive.

Some questions to ask
To help you out in formulating a good constructive critique here are some typical questions to keep in mind as you view an image;

  • What is the first thing you notice?
  • Why do you notice that?
  • Do you think this is what the photographer intended you to notice?
  • What other elements do you take notice of?
  • Why did you notice them?
  • What elements make you think the photographer did this on purpose?
  • What is the most interesting or creative thing you see?
  • Is this point of interest the main focus of the image?
  • If not, how would you suggest the photographer correct that?
  • What is the photograph trying to convey (message)?
  • Why do you think this?
  • How does the photograph make you feel?
  • Why does it do that?
  • Are there any unanswered questions with the image?

__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register for your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.

Last edited by Tat2Duck; 01-09-2014 at 03:03 PM.. Reason: Fixed minor grammar issues
Tat2Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2014   #2
Alpaca
 
Codeblind's Avatar
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 43
CamelKarma: 14919
Editing OK?: No
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

Giving a critique is much more difficult for me than receiving one. In giving the critique I'm worried about damaging someone's developing aesthetic. I could plausibly shred the next would-be Strand's work and send him or her off into obscurity because they were perhaps too sensitive for the manner of critique I leveled at that time and considered my thoughts worth more than the 2 cents my opinion fetches on a good day. As for receiving critiques, I'm old and my skins grown thick.

Considering the suggested questions, I don't know. The first question I ask myself is, "Why am I looking at this?" and then work out from there. Maybe a good critique is one that asks the right questions for the image in a way the given artist can appreciate.
Codeblind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2014   #3
Llama
 
Jeffr37's Avatar
 
Location: Brooks, Oregon
Posts: 536
CamelKarma: 1052480
Editing OK?: Yes
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

Nice write-up tat2duck. I'm guilty of the "I'm still learning" and this is a great learning tool to help understand the thought processes behind critiquing and being critiqued. I know it will help me to start commenting on other people work with more than the "nice capture" without being totally able to understand the why I like it lol.
Jeffr37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2014   #4
F1 Camel
 
Tat2Duck's Avatar
 
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 2,505
CamelKarma: 6617978
Editing OK?: No
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Codeblind View Post
Giving a critique is much more difficult for me than receiving one. In giving the critique I'm worried about damaging someone's developing aesthetic. I could plausibly shred the next would-be Strand's work and send him or her off into obscurity because they were perhaps too sensitive for the manner of critique I leveled at that time...
As an artist, I learned really early to swallow my pride and listen to criticism. It wasn't easy as I was still a teen ager (and teens know everything, right?) but I had a teacher for a mother who taught me the benefits of listening. My philosophy is that if someone who aspires to be an artist needs to be able to let go of their work or they will never survive in the art world. A critique board will then become the litmus test of whether they can hack it or if they'll need to bury their head in the sand and keep their images on their hard drive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffr37 View Post
Nice write-up tat2duck. I'm guilty of the "I'm still learning" and this is a great learning tool to help understand the thought processes behind critiquing and being critiqued. I know it will help me to start commenting on other people work with more than the "nice capture" without being totally able to understand the why I like it lol.
Being able to analyze someone else's work, no matter how minimal at first, is a great way to train your eye for your own work. Stick to what you know and keep at it. Before long you'll be building up your vocabulary to be able to explain your critiques well enough.

I'm glad to hear this tutorial is helpful.
Tat2Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014   #5
F1 Camel
 
Sailor Blue's Avatar
 
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 4,142
CamelKarma: 227845
Editing OK?: Yes
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

One thing about PhotoCamel that I appreciate is that most of the members ask for and welcome criticism.

Reading and understanding the criticism of my images and the images of other members helps me become a better photographer.

To me simply pointing out what is wrong is only half of the critics responsibility in photography. A good critic will not only point out what is wrong but do their best to show the photographer how to make the image better. Tat2Duck, I would add that as a fifth criteria to your list
__________________
--Don--

Canon 7D, Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di, Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, Tamron SP 90MM F/2.8 Di 1:1 Macro
Nissin Di866, Electra CLASSIC Plus studio strobes & modifiers
Sekonic L-358 Flash Meter, Yongnuo RF-602 Transmitters & Receivers
Dell 20" 2001F (1200x1800) IPS monitor, Samsung SyncMaster 23" F2380 (1920x1280) PVA monitor, Datacolor Spyder3Elite for monitor calibration
Sailor Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014   #6
Llama
 
Jeffr37's Avatar
 
Location: Brooks, Oregon
Posts: 536
CamelKarma: 1052480
Editing OK?: Yes
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

The c&c is one of my favorite things to read on here. It's helped me to understand a little better how to "see" the image. :-D
Jeffr37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014   #7
Llama
 
Posts: 547
CamelKarma: 295414
Editing OK?: No
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

That's a thoughtful writeup, Duck. It's a good guide for anyone who comments on photos posted here.

Overall I think crits on PhotoCamel are done in a helpful and constructive way. I also appreciate that the critiques are done with the photographer's level of experience in mind. Folks seem interesting in gently guiding those new to photography towards better photographs by offering positive comments whenever possible and not overwhelming the poster with negative comments.
DianaFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014   #8
Camel Breath
 
patterfr's Avatar
 
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 15,393
CamelKarma: 4373477
Editing OK?: Yes
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

It's a great write up for what to think about when offering a critique, unfortunately to do that for every photo would take too long and people in this day and age won't do it.
That leaves ,most often, no comment or an initial reaction type of comment. These can be helpful too.
The least helpful thing is no comment.

A quick reaction, with one or two things you like and one or two things you would change and how, is about the best it gets 95% of the time.

Nothing wrong with that either and the newer viewers/critiquers ought to start that way. Offering critique is a great way to start to look at your own photography more critically..........

I doubt seriously, though not to dismiss honest feelings, that one person's well intentioned critique could stifle the next photographic master.
__________________
-- Fran


"It's all meaningless unless you know what it means"- Unknown
patterfr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014   #9
Llama
 
Posts: 547
CamelKarma: 295414
Editing OK?: No
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by patterfr View Post
The least helpful thing is no comment.
While I agree with this, I can assure you there have been times that the best response by me has been silence!

Also, I've seen gentle and accurate criticism given that was summarily rejected by the poster because their ego won't allow them to accept advice from "mere mortals". They are only after adulation and constant ego stroking. I don't offer comments. It would be a waste of time.
DianaFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014   #10
F1 Camel
 
Tat2Duck's Avatar
 
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 2,505
CamelKarma: 6617978
Editing OK?: No
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: How to critique photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Blue View Post
...A good critic will not only point out what is wrong but do their best to show the photographer how to make the image better. Tat2Duck, I would add that as a fifth criteria to your list
Ideally it would nice if people gave complete critiques and point out both the positive and negative aspects. that is why I wrote this, to help those who may not know where to begin or understand what is required.

As for the fifth criteria, that is actually a part of the evaluation. A good evaluation will offer a way to correct problems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by patterfr View Post
...The least helpful thing is no comment.

A quick reaction, with one or two things you like and one or two things you would change and how, is about the best it gets 95% of the time.
I thoroughly agree. The trick is to get people to realize that even just a simple input is worth a lot to the OP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DianaFan View Post
Also, I've seen gentle and accurate criticism given that was summarily rejected by the poster because their ego won't allow them to accept advice from "mere mortals". They are only after adulation and constant ego stroking. I don't offer comments. It would be a waste of time.
Yes, there are those circumstances where initial reactions are to dismiss criticism. The truth is that even if they were initially rejected they were read and it did make its point. It may take a few 'hard lessons' or it make take some off-line contemplation but I find that critiques do make an impact whether the OP realizes (or admits) it or not.

Trust me, most people do appreciate critiques but ultimately it is your choice whether you want to offer one or not and that should be respected too.


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register for your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
Tat2Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photography Forum > Tools Of the Trade > Tutorials »


Share this topic:


Tags
criticism, critique, critiquing, how to
Thread Tools
Display Modes