![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#101 (permalink) |
|
Vicuna
|
Nicely done Benji. Many thanks for taking the time. I'll be reading this several times.
peace. __________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#103 (permalink) |
|
Vicuna
|
This is fantastic info and I was referred to it by another photographer which I'm really pleased about.
One question I've been trying to find out what the 1-2-2 and 1-3-2 posing techniques actually relate to (number wise). |
|
__________________
Mark A couple of things with buttons, a few things you can see through, a couple that make the night day and some things I can't be so detailed about that sit in my bag. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 (permalink) |
|
Bactrian
|
Mark,
See the image below for the 1-3-2 and the 1-2-2 poses. The numbers correlate to the position of the body, the face, and the eyes in that order. The # 1 position is anything positioned so it is pointing at a 45 degree angle relative to the camera. So a 1-1-1 pose would be where the body, face and eyes all point at a 45 degree angle relative to the camera. This pose would be quite boring! The # 2 position is when anything is pointed toward the camera. A 2-2-2 pose would be where the subject's body, face and eyes are all pointed directly square to the camera. This pose would also be quite boring! A 1-3-3 pose would be where the body is posed at a 45 degree angle and the head and eyes are turned about 30 to 40 degrees back beyond the camera. This pose would look rather strange (although I have seen it before and I have even done it a few times.) Ben |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 (permalink) |
|
Vicuna
|
Ben thanks for that, it makes more sense now. Great info btw!!
|
|
__________________
Mark A couple of things with buttons, a few things you can see through, a couple that make the night day and some things I can't be so detailed about that sit in my bag. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 (permalink) |
|
F1 Camel
|
|
|
__________________
I wish I could but I don't want to ... C&C appreciated - please do not edit my photos, Thanks http://flickr.com/photos/felixreichardt/sets/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 (permalink) |
|
Vicuna
|
Wow, you mention Don Peterson and his rules. I was one of Don's student photographers a few years ago. Worked with him and Kurt Jafay in the old D&F tower in Denver. What I learned from Don, I with a little modification still practice today. When reading your extension of his rule list I feel like I am again sitting in camera room 1 listening to him and watching him demonstrate why the rules are so important. Viewing a good deal of the work supposedly created by first class camera persons today, I find the rules I believed in and lived by are seldom used. Such a shame!
Well enough said I just wanted you to know that someone did follow Don's rules and was very successful with them. I do miss Don, Alvin Duis, Kurt, Leon Kannamer and the many of the old PPofA gang. C Webb AKA Old Coyote |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 (permalink) |
|
Bactrian
|
Well "Old Coyote" it is good to hear from you, and yes a lot of the old masters have gone on to their reward. I never personally met Don Peterson but after reading the book "The Master Book of Portraiture and Studio Management" that he authored I almost feel like I had. Speaking of masters of photography, Don Blair comes to mind. He was a gentleman plain and simple and he loved photography even after being a photographer for over 50 years. He got excited every time he tripped the shutter. Monte Zucker is another master that is no longer with us. I sat under Monte's teaching several times. He wasn't as friendly as Don Blair was though. A master that is still with us although I believe he is retired is Frank Cricchio. What an awesome photographer. I sat under his teaching in Chicago in 1982. What a master of lighting and posing. I fear for the new crop of photographers, although I suppose every old timer has said the same thing about each new crop of youngsters.
Ben |
|
|
|