![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Llama
|
This passed me when I was in town this morning - luckily I had my camera with me.
Did a bit of Googling: 1932 Austin Seven AG Tourer: 4 cyl petrol engine, 10.5 hp: Max speed 51 mph: 38 mpg: 4 (imp) gal fuel tank. ![]() __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Bactrian
|
Something looks odd.....hmmmm I see it, he's on the wrong side of the road
![]() This is a good shot for just grabbing it as he drove down the road. There's really nothing in this photo to date it as a modern shot so a B&W tratment would work well and give it a timeless feel. |
|
__________________
E. Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Llama
|
Quote:
Good idea - your wish is my command ! I have cropped it very slightly to remove some modern street "furniture". The B & W makes the background shops look less modern too. I had never seen that car around here before; just been down town to stick my car through the car wash and saw it again ! (not in the car wash, I hasten to add) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Bactrian
|
Keep a pen and paper handy and the next time you see him hit him up for his phone number. Call him to set up a shoot with the car. You never know he might have a vintage driving outfit to go with the car.
Love the B&W over the colour version. |
|
__________________
E. Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Llama
|
Thanks for your comments........... Interesting difference in points of view between us on these two photographs. You prefer the B & W, whereas I much prefer the colour. I can see your point of view - old car, use B & W and make it more evocative of the time. I did try sepia, thought it was awful; you might think that even better. To me it is a photograph of an old car; beautifully kept/restored, so I want the photograph to show to the best possible advantage the physical state of the car - the gleaming paint/chrome, etc; which (to me !) the B & W doesn't do. Perhaps it is my background as an engineer rather than as an artist of any kind. As an aside, this photo is a good advert for why my camera is always set to "P" unless I am actually using it in another mode - had I needed to reset the camera from another mode I would probably have got an over/underexposed/blurred view of the rear of the car disappearing down the road.......... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Bactrian
|
Quote:
(no I didn't take it that way)So you have hit the nail on the head... it's art and art is subjective. Plus you have pegged my perspective perfectly. |
|
|
__________________
E. Jones |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Vicuna
|
Wow, that Austin is really small or the driver is really big. Beautiful picture. Thanks for sharing.
__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features. |
|
__________________
Never drink down stream of the herd. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Share this topic: |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A 1932 Duesenberg | Benji | Transportation | 2 | 09-14-2011 07:49 PM |
| 1932 Highboys | Richard Small | Transportation | 9 | 02-25-2010 01:45 PM |
| 1932 Ford Cabriolet | Richard Small | HDR Photography | 3 | 12-21-2009 08:59 AM |
| 1932 Ford Truck | Richard Small | HDR Photography | 12 | 11-22-2009 01:06 PM |
| Blue 1932 Highboy | Richard Small | HDR Photography | 4 | 08-22-2009 03:54 PM |