![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Alpaca
|
only real nit is the frozen props. Lower your shutter a bit (1/125 or lower) to get a good propeller blur. these planes look somewhat like models suspended in mid-air with the frozen props. did you use a polarizer? the sky could be a bit darker...
nice timing, and good exposure. sometimes getting decent color exposure against a blue sky is a pain in the a$$. __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
F1 Camel
|
I have a good friend who makes a portion of his income in aviation photography. He has stuff on display at several museums including the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum, the museum at Oshkosh and the Wright Brothers Memorial Museum. I'm always stunned by his images, they are truly great pieces of work technically and artistically. He has a variety of prop and rotor images both with and without motion blur in the blades.
I think it depends on the context. For instance, military choppers look more menacing and lethal if the blades are frozen or showing multiples from a harmonic effect. Old fixed wing aircraft usually look better with blurred props... certainly aerobatic planes look better that way. Most of his jet images, (he has killer access to military aircraft) are frozen. He has this one series that is just too cool with WWII warbirds paired with modern counterparts—a P51 Mustang flying wing on an F15 Eagle for instance... and now that I think about it, I don't recall if the props were frozen... I'll get back to you on that. ![]() I love aircraft but have done no aviation photography. I always wanted to get a slow exposure from the cockpit doing spins but I never got around to it. :P Chip |
|
__________________
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Bactrian
Location: Seoul (Korea), Toulouse (France) & Warsaw (Poland)
Posts: 1,864
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
CamelKarma: 2114
Gallery
|
Blog
|
Thank you Chip
Lots of good advices! When I did this photo (and the other plane and chopper pics) on Sunday I was in the crowd, fighting not to have a head in front of my lens and facing the sun so I have to admit I was not in the best condition to pay with my camera setting so mist of my shots where taken at high shutter speed. For sur next time I will try different possibilities. __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features. |
|
__________________
Des photos de femmes pour les femmes. My website: www.lorekphoto.com My email: lorekphoto@hotmail.com Please visit my new site on www.lorekstudio.com I EOS 40D + 24-70mm 2.8 + 70-200mm 2.8 + 100 mm 2.8 macro + 15 mm 2.8 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Share this topic: |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Filter comparison "none" " UV" " 81A" and "polarize" . | dvdowns | Camera Accessories Forum | 8 | 06-25-2008 08:24 AM |