PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
Photo of the Week Photo of the Week

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum > Cameras and Lenses > Sony Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2008   #1
Guanaco
 
rshunk's Avatar
 
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 435
rshunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 668
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Just curious - Why Sony?

I've been meaning to ask this of other Sony users here for while: Why Sony? What made you decide that Sony was the way to go when it came time for you to purchase your camera? Why choose "the new kid on the block" over other, more established, camera companies?

For me, I've been a Minolta shooter for over 20 years and have too many lenses that fit the Minolta AF mount to even consider changing to another brand. I started with Minolta AF film cameras in the mid-80's and progressed into the digital realm with the release of the KM-7D.

Once Minolta (Konica-Minolta) sold their camera division to Sony and Sony decided to keep the same AF mount - I knew that some of my favorite lenses would continue to be used for many years to come.

When Sony introduced the A700 last year - I knew it was the camera I wanted, so I pre-ordered it and never looked back. Sony took the best of the KM-7D and added their own "wow!" features to create a camera thet still blows me away everytime I use it.

Okay - your turn. Why Sony?


Bob S.


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
A700+VG | 7D+VG || Minolta Legacy: 20|24|28|50|50M|100M|28-85|28-135|35-70|35-105|Beercan|80-200(blk)|100-200 || KM DT: 18-70 ||
Sigma Zen: 14|400|600 || Tokina AT-X: 17|100-300

My Zenfolio Gallery
rshunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2008   #2
F1 Camel
 
tbnj's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,229
tbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armortbnj strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 17910
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

I had a really hard time deciding. I looked hard at Sony, Pentax, Canon and Nikon. The Sony felt a lot better in my hands than the Canon. Don't recall if I played much with any Nikons before deciding.

I liked that I could get good quality Minolta lenses that would fit it, at good prices. All of the reviews I read about the Sony were good (started with the A100 and now have the A700). The pricing on them was very good at the time.

As I recall, what finally pushed me over to Sony was the in body IS. I liked that whatever lens I put on it would be stabilized. I've been happy with my decision. Aside from the annoying proprietary hot shoe mount (which really isn't hard to deal with), I love my Sony.
__________________
~ Tina

tbnj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2008   #3
PhotoCamel Supporter DONATED
Camel Breath
 
Mr. Pickles's Avatar
 
Location: Old Folks Home
Posts: 12,659
Mr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 7932
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

I don't have a Sony, but they aren't really the new kid on the block. They bought out Konica-Minolta, and from what I knew, the people for KM went along with the purchase. So nothing really changed except for the name on the front, and maybe some new styling ideas and such. It took them a bit to ramp up and get it going, but they seem to be going well now....especially with a FF very high MP sensor, and don't forget, Sony has long been the sensor of choice for Nikon, even before Sony bought KM....
__________________

Dumpster Diving Challenge


Idiot Savant AND trouble-maker...
What's Camel Karma?
Posting Images Tutorial
Mr. Pickles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008   #4
Guanaco
 
rshunk's Avatar
 
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 435
rshunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond reputershunk has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 668
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Pickles View Post
I don't have a Sony, but they aren't really the new kid on the block. They bought out Konica-Minolta, and from what I knew, the people for KM went along with the purchase. So nothing really changed except for the name on the front, and maybe some new styling ideas and such. It took them a bit to ramp up and get it going, but they seem to be going well now....especially with a FF very high MP sensor, and don't forget, Sony has long been the sensor of choice for Nikon, even before Sony bought KM....
I understand what you're saying, but as a DSLR brand name, they are still pretty new - no matter whats under the hood (so to speak), which is exactly why I went with Sony (or stayed with Minolta, depending on how you look at it).

Sony seems to be doing well in the market so that's why I was asking what made people choose them over more long-standing names on the market. Was it price? Ergonomics? Name recognition? You had a ton of Minolta gear? Or was it something else?


Bob S.
__________________
A700+VG | 7D+VG || Minolta Legacy: 20|24|28|50|50M|100M|28-85|28-135|35-70|35-105|Beercan|80-200(blk)|100-200 || KM DT: 18-70 ||
Sigma Zen: 14|400|600 || Tokina AT-X: 17|100-300

My Zenfolio Gallery
rshunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008   #5
Photocamel Master
 
Lee4145's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 5,767
Lee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorLee4145 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 7177
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

When it's time to send my 7D to the second chair I'll be getting one.
The reason will largely be because it fits a good bit of Minolta gear I already have.
__________________

Project4145







Lee4145 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008   #6
Guanaco
 
Ardea's Avatar
 
Location: North Florida
Posts: 464
Ardea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorArdea strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1327
Editing OK?: No
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

I have always had Sony digitals, so I was familiar enough with their p&s cameras to use them out of the box. It made sense to go with the A100 when it was released--I found literally no bad reviews of it (I inherited the compulsion to research every purchase to death from my dad), and since I do most of my shooting from a kayak, having the image stabilization built into the camera was a big deal, given that tripod use was impractical and I didn't want to pay more for the lenses. The A700 was a logical upgrade for me since I had lots of lenses from my A100 purchase.

HOWEVER, all that said, I jumped ship. I have kept the A700 as a backup but moved to the Nikon D300. I had to, because of the lack of quality lenses for the Sony. Oh, they'll be out in a few years, but I need them now. I wanted more choice. I sold the lenses for the Sony that were non-vital and kept the rest--but I have not picked the camera up since getting the D300 in July. <Sigh>
Ardea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008   #7
Vicuna
 
Tom BELL's Avatar
 
Posts: 111
Tom BELL is a glorious beacon of light
CamelKarma: 73
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

I bought mine after looking at prices and equipment. Sony had a better deal. I bought a A350 with the 18-70 and 55-200 zooms. I couldn't ask for a better digital entry kit.
Tom BELL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008   #8
Vicuna
 
kkart's Avatar
 
Location: Colorado
Posts: 151
kkart has much to be proud ofkkart has much to be proud of
CamelKarma: 123
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

For the same reasons some of you have mentioned, my a350 will be on order this week, having used Minolta gear for numerous years and still actively using and shooting my 5D, it just makes sense!
__________________
John De Bord Photography
"Using The Mind Of Minolta"
deviantArt: http://kkart.deviantart.com
Website: http://jdebordphoto.com
Blog: http://jdebordphoto.blogspot.com/
kkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008   #9
Guanaco
 
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 468
fjbyrne has a reputation beyond reputefjbyrne has a reputation beyond reputefjbyrne has a reputation beyond reputefjbyrne has a reputation beyond reputefjbyrne has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 423
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

My first digital SLR was Konica Minolta 5D because IMO it was the best value at the time I purchased it. After the Sony buyout of KM's photo division I took a "wait and see" attitude. Sony had a couple of stumbles IMO but overall have performed really well. I think the A700 and A900 are real photographer's cameras with features that are optimized for taking still photos.

As a side note I find it very interesting the Canon and Nikon are taking the more "P&S" route with their higher-end cameras than Sony (live view and video comes to mind). I would have expected Sony to lead this consumer oriented approach instead of the "photographer's tool" approach (but let me add that I am not bashing live view or video - don't have either so I don't know what I may be missing). Looks like the original KM folks still have a lot of pull in the new Sony division which is a VERY good thing IMO.
__________________
--
fjbyrne

Last edited by fjbyrne; 11-06-2008 at 07:23 PM.. Reason: typo
fjbyrne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008   #10
Vicuna
 
Tom BELL's Avatar
 
Posts: 111
Tom BELL is a glorious beacon of light
CamelKarma: 73
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

Well, I've had my 350 for about a month now. I want a macro lens and a stobe, that should do it.

Last edited by Tom BELL; 11-06-2008 at 06:25 PM.. Reason: Sig
Tom BELL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008   #11
Vicuna
 
Tom BELL's Avatar
 
Posts: 111
Tom BELL is a glorious beacon of light
CamelKarma: 73
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

And better places to shoot.
__________________
Canon G9
Sony A 350
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tombell/
Tom BELL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008   #12
Alpaca
 
Location: Pinedale, Wyoming
Posts: 4
dFlyer will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 25
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

My first DSLR was a canon 20D, didn't like the IQ, when the A100 came out I got it for the 10 MP and much lower price than the 20D. I liked the IQ at low ISO over the 20D so sold it and got the A700 when it came out. Since FW v4 the A700 is all I use and Love it.

Gary
dFlyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2008   #13
Alpaca
 
Location: Denmark
Posts: 4
ZigZak will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 26
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

Like tbnj I spent hours/days reading articles about DSLR before I decided to buy my first DSLR Sony Alpha 100.

I was very happy with that camera, but after a year I decided to go one step further and buy the Alpha 700 instead and I've never regretted that change.

I recall, what finally pushed me over to Sony was the in body IS and the easy-handling of the camera.

Regards
ZigZak
ZigZak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008   #14
Alpaca
 
Location: Canada
Posts: 3
twixpix will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 10
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rshunk View Post

For me, I've been a Minolta shooter for over 20 years and have too many lenses that fit the Minolta AF mount to even consider changing to another brand. I started with Minolta AF film cameras in the mid-80's and progressed into the digital realm with the release of the KM-7D.


When Sony introduced the A700 last year - I knew it was the camera I wanted, so I pre-ordered it and never looked back. Sony took the best of the KM-7D and added their own "wow!" features to create a camera thet still blows me away everytime I use it.

Okay - your turn. Why Sony?


Bob S.
Similar story here, except I now own the A900, the thing is though I don't use any of the Minolta glass I had from my film days so looking back, I could've gone in another direction in the switch to digital. It's now a mixture of more recently acquired vintage Minolta lenses (beercan, etc.), a Sigma and mainly new Sony ones. I still am happy with the decision!

David
__________________
http://www.twixpix.com
twixpix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008   #15
Alpaca
 
Location: Singapore
Posts: 49
ShutterBug will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 25
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rshunk View Post
I've been meaning to ask this of other Sony users here for while: Why Sony? What made you decide that Sony was the way to go when it came time for you to purchase your camera? Why choose "the new kid on the block" over other, more established, camera companies?

For me, I've been a Minolta shooter for over 20 years and have too many lenses that fit the Minolta AF mount to even consider changing to another brand. I started with Minolta AF film cameras in the mid-80's and progressed into the digital realm with the release of the KM-7D.

Once Minolta (Konica-Minolta) sold their camera division to Sony and Sony decided to keep the same AF mount - I knew that some of my favorite lenses would continue to be used for many years to come.

When Sony introduced the A700 last year - I knew it was the camera I wanted, so I pre-ordered it and never looked back. Sony took the best of the KM-7D and added their own "wow!" features to create a camera thet still blows me away everytime I use it.

Okay - your turn. Why Sony?


Bob S.
Ok, here's a summary of what's in my gear room;

Bodies: 2 x A700, & 2 x A900
Flashes: 2 x HVL-F58AM, 1 x HVL-42AM, 1 x 5600HS
Lenses: 18 in total covering full focal ranges with additions of 2 Sony ZEISS the Plannar T 85mm & 16-80mm Vario

Like yourself, I was similarly a Minolta guy. Obviously when Minolta gave up its camera division to SONY, I gladly jumped in and picked up my very first DSLR the A100 some 2 years ago and now I have a plathora of SONY bodies and lenses. I am totally sold on SONY photography! To me, the A700 is much like a BMW roadster, while the A900 is the Mercedes CLS coupe. Mighty machines these two!

Of all the SONY lenses, I think only their Carl Zeiss & G lenses stands out very well in performance. And they need to buck up on their lens designs - they should drop those fine ribbed zoom rings for something much easier to clean and doesn't gather grime and dirt particles so easily! Also, they ought to step up production of lenses now that the A900 is in circulation.

In terms of brand name product relation, I think we should all be glad it is SONY and not some other names we might find ourselves hard put to utter when asked "what camera are you using?" At least SONY has already been producing some pretty decent Point & Shoots for some decades, and they are mighty BIG as an establishment that produces a wide range of electronic products. However, the only gripe I have about SONY, is in their eye-popping pricing tradition.
ShutterBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008   #16
Alpaca
 
alpha200's Avatar
 
Posts: 2
alpha200 will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 10
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

For me it was Minolta technology, great price, excellent reviews and very important for me - ergonomics. Felt much better in my hand than Canon or Nikon. Plus, the best feature - Steady Shot inside the body, comparing to big names and lens IS. For price I paid, my Alpha brought way more standard features than same category Canon or Nikon.
alpha200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008   #17
Alpaca
 
Posts: 1
sarah_9 will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 10
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

Hello,

Why Sony, because Sony is the best, i have Sony camcorder , Sony camera and even Sony LCD, their quality is superb, i recently purchased a camcorder from online shoppers auction, and its working is awesome the quality of pictures is far more better than any other company`s product.


Regards,
sarah_9
sarah_9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2008   #18
Dromedary
 
Jose's Avatar
 
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,195
Jose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJose strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1279
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

Sony is the rude awakening for Canon and Nikon...it already makes some of the sensors used in Nikon's top cameras. And Sony lenses are optically outstanding performers.
Jose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008   #19
Guanaco
 
TheRileyFactor's Avatar
 
Location: Texas
Posts: 307
TheRileyFactor is just really very very niceTheRileyFactor is just really very very niceTheRileyFactor is just really very very niceTheRileyFactor is just really very very niceTheRileyFactor is just really very very niceTheRileyFactor is just really very very niceTheRileyFactor is just really very very nice
CamelKarma: 752
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

I seriously considered buying a Sony before ultimately pulling the trigger on a 20d. The in-body IS is a very attractive feature, and the Sony's stack up VERY well to the competition. If I could have bought an a700 at the same pricepoint as I bought my 20d, I may be telling a different story here today, but as it was I felt I needed the more robust body of the 20d and it was about the same price (actually a bit lower) than I could have bought an a100.

I look forward to seeing what the future holds for Sony. I like having mutiple brands of exceptional quality for a product, it pushes the others to make better cameras, especially with the DR wars that are about to begin!

-Daniel
__________________
Canon 20D, Sigma 70-200 F2.8, Canon 24-85 F3.5-4.5 USM, Canon 50mm F1.8, Canon Speedlite 550EX, Canon AE-1, Canon 28mm F2.8 (manual), 50mm F1.8 (manual), 70-210mm F4-5.6 (Manual), Speedlight 199
TheRileyFactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009   #20
Vicuna
 
Location: Ireland
Posts: 53
Jaqian will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 15
Default Re: Just curious - Why Sony?

I looked around at a few different brands. I had a Nikon D70 for abouot two months but didn't like it and wasn't overly pushed on Canon. I was looking at either Olympus or Sony, I thought Sony was better value and especially with all the Minolta glass available.

So I bought a used A100 (€200) in pwo (like new) with the 18-70 kit lens and then bought a Minolta Dynax 300si (€50) purely for its Cosina 70-210mm AF and its 35-70mm AF. Will also check out M42 lens for a bit of fun.

I was also able to sell my Fuji S9000 for €200, which means I basically got a free upgrade

I want a flash and 50mm lens next


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
Sony α A100
Sony 18-70mm AF DT
Cosina 70-210mm AF
Sigma 100-300mm AF
Jaqian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum > Cameras and Lenses > Sony Forum »


Bookmarks
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I am curious.... Inked Photography Lighting and Technique 47 06-09-2008 04:13 PM
FS/FA/WTT: Sony A100 with Sony DT 18-200mm lens ELSELS Marketplace 0 05-22-2008 12:03 AM
Just curious... Ellbee99 Portraits / People 5 05-20-2008 07:15 PM