PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
Photo of the Week Photo of the Week

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community > The Photographer > Photography Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2005   #1 (permalink)
Guanaco
 
Posts: 430
hartcons has a spectacular aura about
CamelKarma: 32
Default Tamron 19-35 vs. 17-35

Was in the store the other day looking for a wide lens and they had the Tamron 19-35 and the Tamron 17-35. I was told that the DI lenses were only for digital (which I now believe is incorrect in that only the DI II lenses are digital-only but not the DI lenses). Anyway, I was wondering if it's worth the extra money for the 17-35 vs. the 19-35? The 19-35 is nice and light and does balance well on my Nikon N75 film body (with some of the heavier lenses I have to work the zoom with my right hand). But if I put the lens on my d70 will I wish I had the DI version (which supposedly is optimized for digital but will work on film as well)?

__________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
Oregon, USA<br />Even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut.
hartcons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2005   #2 (permalink)
F1 Camel
 
Location: Jax FL
Posts: 2,903
badpickev has a reputation beyond reputebadpickev has a reputation beyond reputebadpickev has a reputation beyond reputebadpickev has a reputation beyond reputebadpickev has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 473
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Tamron 19-35 vs. 17-35

the 19-35 is the gp or consurmer grade lens. the 17-35 is the better of the two. You are correct on the tamron lens designation. Di is the same as sigma's DG and Di II is the same as DC or nikons DX lenses

__________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
Fuji S2/S3/S5 Pro
Kenko MC7 2X, Pro 300
Nkkor 50 1.8 70-300VR
Phoenix 100, 650-1300& Sima 100mm F2 SF
Sigma 12-24, 18-50 HSM, 18-125, 50-500, 70-300, 120-300, 1.4X 2x
Tamron 28-75
badpickev is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community > The Photographer > Photography Talk »


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tamron 17-50 2,8 stan43 Weddings 10 10-01-2006 07:51 PM
Question about the Tamron 28-300 Mithras Photography Talk 3 07-28-2006 11:10 PM
Anyone using The Tamron 18-200mmm AF ? dc2 Photography Talk 5 05-13-2006 03:11 PM
Some landscapes with 5D/Tamron 28-75 J.A.F. Doorhof Landscape and Travel 6 03-14-2006 07:00 PM
Tamron 300 2.8 vs Sigma 300 2.8 cophotoguy Canon Forum 3 08-18-2005 06:43 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.



SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0