PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
Photo of the Week Photo of the Week

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum > The Photographer > Photography Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2007   #1 (permalink)
Loa
Guanaco
 
Loa's Avatar
 
Location: Quebec
Posts: 480
Loa has a brilliant futureLoa has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 155
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Not sure about the D300

Hello,

I don't want to start a flame war between Canon and Nikon, so please consider the bodies for what they are, regardless of the brand attached to it. And I know it's not a new debate.

I'm a long time Nikon user, so the step up from my D70 to the upcoming D300 seemed logical. But I've been reading up and comparing photos taken from the pre-production D300 and the new 40D. Basic (and old, I know) problem: high ISO noise.

Some pictures are available here: Nikon D300 High ISO Sample Images from an Expo in Paris « The Nikon D300 Journal

Just compare the full sized ISO 1000 from the D300 with any photos taken with the 40D, at ISO 1600.

The Canon wins hands down. Pure and simple. In the end, by taking a 40D instead of a D300, I save a couple hundred bucks, and loose nothing more than 2 Mpixels and a gorgeous LCD.

That's it? (And change my lenses, yes)

Now I know those are pre-prod bodies. But how different can high ISO noise images be from now to the final D300?

Is there more to the D300 that I'm missing? Anything that is ***significantly*** better than the 40D?

Thanks,

Loa

P.S. I don't care about Canon and Nikon: I just want to know if the D300 can catch up to the 40D in the high ISO department.


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
---

My Humble Gallery

(Now translated in French/English)
Loa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #2 (permalink)
F1 Camel
 
Nikonfreak's Avatar
 
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,134
Nikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1178
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

It really depends on the tweaks they make before final release. At this point, I would imagine there won't be many hardware changes, but software tweaks might very well be in the works.

Either one will do the trick.

Since high ISO noise seems to be one area Nikon is focusing on mentioning with the new releases, one would expect things to have been beefed up. I shoot high ISO pretty much all the time at concerts and I think the D200 did a great job of cleaning things up.

I'd say the differences in normal size prints aren't going to be noticeable.

Some other things are going to be much more important than the concept of who's got the best noise reduction in camera or which has the lowest noise levels. Getting the right exposure is one element that can't be overlooked as are in camera settings.

Focus on what you need for your shooting in the way of lenses and accessories and what is going to be the best fit for you.

Julio

Home
__________________
I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of 'taking care' of them. - Thomas Jefferson
Nikonfreak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #3 (permalink)
Llama
 
KABeach's Avatar
 
Posts: 685
KABeach is a glorious beacon of light
CamelKarma: 84
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

First, I would never make a camera decision based on internet postings of a camera that has not been released yet...

Within hours if the D300 shipping, you will start to see some decent comparisons by a fairly wide variety of shooters - within a week, you should start to see some samples in a wide variety of situations...

At this point, my intent is to purchase a D300, but I'm going to wait to see what the final product looks like before I pull the trigger... Actually, I'll probably wait until 1st quarter next year to let them shake out all those v1.0 bugs that inevitably crop up...

Hopefully, the D300 will start shipping in only a few weeks and then you can decide which camera is best for you, based on real people using it in real world situations...

Cheers!
Ken
__________________
Shoot Tight. Crop Tighter.

www.kabeach.com
KABeach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #4 (permalink)
Loa
Guanaco
 
Loa's Avatar
 
Location: Quebec
Posts: 480
Loa has a brilliant futureLoa has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 155
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikonfreak View Post
Since high ISO noise seems to be one area Nikon is focusing on mentioning with the new releases, one would expect things to have been beefed up.
That's what I expected too. But seeing those pre-prods... argh. Makes me wonder if Nikon can really improve from those prototypes to the production models in such a short amount of time...

Let's hope they can, as high ISO is important for me.

Thanks for the comments guys.

Loa
__________________
---

My Humble Gallery

(Now translated in French/English)
Loa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #5 (permalink)
Dromedary
 
Sidebyte's Avatar
 
Location: Medellin, Colombia S.A.
Posts: 1,515
Sidebyte has a reputation beyond reputeSidebyte has a reputation beyond reputeSidebyte has a reputation beyond reputeSidebyte has a reputation beyond reputeSidebyte has a reputation beyond reputeSidebyte has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 585
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

I won't buy the D-300 or any other Nikon camera as long as they continue to screw the public with their software offerings compared to a very workable software package from other manufactures. What a cavalier attitude, we know we can glean more money out of you if you want to use RAW etc.
Not the camera pricing I object to but the continued attitude of Nikon in general. If I liked Nikon lenses I would opt for the Fuji instead, that's basically why I had the Kodak 14n in the first place because of the excellent software package (jpeg's) and that still offered the best JPEG software package to date.
Nikon even approached a court battle with Adobe over their supposed proprietary code for Nikon RAW processing, that's the attitude I object to.
__________________
“A fool seeks vengeance. The wise man seeks justice.”
Sidebyte is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #6 (permalink)
Dromedary
 
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,143
Tom Swaman has a brilliant futureTom Swaman has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 194
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Different strokes for different folks...... Oh, I apologize, I meant different bodies for different cameras.

Well, just a stupid guess, but most likely Nikon has shipped the first match of D300 so I doubt that any big fix is included.

Second, as we all know, cameras work and feel differently and the users use them and treat them differently so you pays your money and takes your chances!!!!!

"Elementary my dear photographer. Elementary."

Tom
Tom Swaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #7 (permalink)
DONATED
Camel Breath
 
Mr. Pickles's Avatar
 
Location: Old Folks Home
Posts: 12,361
Mr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMr. Pickles strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 6828
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

I would NEVER make a camera purchase based on a look at noise levels at 100% or higher.

Noise is very much over-rated in my opinion. Is it a factor? Yes. Is it THE factor? Absolutely not, except for those that take all their images by candlelight.

Noise is an easy thing to trigger on and "flame" others with. You can't really argue the other more practical reasons to buy a particular camera, like it works with a bag of lenses you have, or it fits your hand like a glove, or the controls are laid out better for your hand, or they are laid out in a method that makes it easier for your brain to function around them, etc.

Also, as has been mentioned I think, looking at pre-production images, or images made by a camera that isn't finalize and shipped yet, is NOT a great idea.

Canon is better at noise reduction. This does not need to be mentioned every time a new camera comes out. But, if you read a lot about what noise is and how it is reduced, you will find that there is a trade-off to more aggressive noise reduction. Other camera brands factor that into the image...
__________________
Idiot Savant AND trouble-maker...
What's Camel Karma?
Posting Images Tutorial
Mr. Pickles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #8 (permalink)
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,167
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

The samples look okay to me, especially at 6400. Also, the images look at least 1/3-stop underexposed. Like everyone said, we're looking at internet samples.

How large are you printing?

Quote:
I save a couple hundred bucks, and loose nothing more than 2 Mpixels and a gorgeous LCD.
Um, what about the 51-point AF system? In-camera time lapse capture without use of a computer? Obviously some features won't matter to you, but you can use the side-by-side comparison at DPReview to get a general idea of each camera's feature set.

Quote:
as high ISO is important for me.
It's important to me too, but I still use a D2H. Seen that thing at high ISO before? =)
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #9 (permalink)
Loa
Guanaco
 
Loa's Avatar
 
Location: Quebec
Posts: 480
Loa has a brilliant futureLoa has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 155
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Hello,

Thanks for the added comments, and thanks for not starting a Nikon Vs Canon debate!

Beside photography, I also enjoy playing Irish folk music. That means that when I try to combine both passions, I find myself taking pictures of friends at Irish sessions or concerts, with a 1.8 50mm lens at 1600 ISO on my D70.

See why it's important to me?

I looked at the side-by-side, and yes the D300 is more feature-rich, but to *me* high ISO noise is more important than the focus system, 2 megapixels and incredible LCD. Yet I have 4 nikkor lenses that I don't feel like trading/selling.

Does Canon make anything better than the 40D, without going into the 4000$ plus territory? (I'm quite familiar with Nikon's line-up, not quite as much with Canon's).

Thanks,

Loa
__________________
---

My Humble Gallery

(Now translated in French/English)
Loa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #10 (permalink)
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,167
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Quote:
I find myself taking pictures of friends at Irish sessions or concerts, with a 1.8 50mm lens at 1600 ISO on my D70.
My cameras are frequently at ISO 3200, and one has inferior high ISO performance to the D70, which I also own.

Again, how big are you printing, and are you printing it at all?
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #11 (permalink)
Loa
Guanaco
 
Loa's Avatar
 
Location: Quebec
Posts: 480
Loa has a brilliant futureLoa has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 155
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Hello,

No printing yet, only web / personal computer viewing. But I should start working with a friend for her CD cover very soon.

But even for on-screen viewing, going from a sharp ISO 200-400 to a grainy ISO 1600 is a drastic change...

Loa
__________________
---

My Humble Gallery

(Now translated in French/English)
Loa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007   #12 (permalink)
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,167
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Quote:
No printing yet, only web / personal computer viewing
Noise looks way better in print. I don't see very much noise from my D70 or D2H up to 8.5x11 inches, even at ISO 1600.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007   #13 (permalink)
Llama
 
KABeach's Avatar
 
Posts: 685
KABeach is a glorious beacon of light
CamelKarma: 84
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

I also want to point out that good AF does make a difference - in dim light, my D70 struggles quite a bit - add a shallow DoF lens, and I start to get a lot more OOF shots... for example, in a dim gym, the D70 does fine with the 50/1.8, an OK job with the 85/1.8 and a downright crummy job with the 135/2... a D2h on the other hand, while the focus slows a bit in low light, does a MUCH better job at locking on...

I spend a lot of time shooting in low light situations, and am looking forward to something better than either the D70 or D2h (especially for theater work)... Noise is only a part of the equation...

Cheers!
Ken
__________________
Shoot Tight. Crop Tighter.

www.kabeach.com
KABeach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007   #14 (permalink)
Photocamel Master
 
Max@Home's Avatar
 
Location: Castricum, The Netherlands
Posts: 6,284
Max@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 6171
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loa View Post
Hello,

Does Canon make anything better than the 40D, without going into the 4000$ plus territory?
...only the FF 5D ($/€ 2.250-2.500) is between the 40D and 1D series...

Kindest regards,

Max@Home
__________________

[All
Canon] [EF16-35L II] [EF24-70L] [EF24-105L IS] [EF28-300L IS] [EF70-200F2.8L IS] [EF100-400L IS] [EF50F1.4] [EF85F1.2L II] [EF135F2.0L] [EF 1.4x II] [270ex] [430ex II] [580ex II] [ST-E2] [CP-E4] [EOS-1D Mk III] [EOS 5D MkII with BG-E6] [CPS Europe member]

...PBase images ?? ...or: SmugMug images ??
Max@Home is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007   #15 (permalink)
Loa
Guanaco
 
Loa's Avatar
 
Location: Quebec
Posts: 480
Loa has a brilliant futureLoa has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 155
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Hello,

Thanks for the added inputs.

Michael, thanks for this info: I always thought that print would look more noisy than screen.


Ken: I've had a few problems with my D70 focusing in low-light, but not all that much. The D70 was a step up from my previous camera, the Coolpix 5700. That camera couldn't focus AT ALL in low-light. So the D70 is a dream come true for me in that department!

Max: I'll look it up, but it may be out of my budget... Thanks.

Loa
__________________
---

My Humble Gallery

(Now translated in French/English)
Loa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007   #16 (permalink)
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,167
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Quote:
Michael, thanks for this info: I always thought that print would look more noisy than screen.
Also, one should keep "normal viewing distances" in mind. Your viewers probably are not going to be staring at an 11x14 print with their nose an inch from the print; if they do, they will no doubt see some noise, even at lower ISO values. I made an 11x14 print from a cropped D2H JPEG shot at ISO 1000 and pushed nearly a full stop in post and it looked great from normal viewing distances.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007   #17 (permalink)
Loa
Guanaco
 
Loa's Avatar
 
Location: Quebec
Posts: 480
Loa has a brilliant futureLoa has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 155
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Hello Michael.

Thanks for the added info. I'll keep it in mind when comparing shots from production D300. I really don't wanna "start-over" with another brand, but from the shots I saw on the web, it's a bit disconcerting...

Loa
__________________
---

My Humble Gallery

(Now translated in French/English)
Loa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007   #18 (permalink)
Dromedary
 
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,143
Tom Swaman has a brilliant futureTom Swaman has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 194
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

O.K., so you are really worried about noise, Huh? Why not buy the latest point-and-shoot that takes 18.37mp on a 1/1.6" CCD using a 17:1 optical zoom with a 15 X digital zoom and only a 7.3 second delay between pushing the shutter and shutter activation. Sony will sell you a pair of stereo headsets that plug into the camera so you can hear the noise as it is generated..... Ahh, progress!

Tom
Tom Swaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007   #19 (permalink)
Loa
Guanaco
 
Loa's Avatar
 
Location: Quebec
Posts: 480
Loa has a brilliant futureLoa has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 155
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Hello Tom,

Thank you very much for your very wise counsel. I learned a lot from your words.

Loa
__________________
---

My Humble Gallery

(Now translated in French/English)
Loa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007   #20 (permalink)
Dromedary
 
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,143
Tom Swaman has a brilliant futureTom Swaman has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 194
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Loa,

You are very welcome. I am happy to introduce a bit of humor into a discussion of "take a guess."

Loa, IMHO, noise is very mis-rated and typically overemphasized in the better DSLRs. Furthermore, noise can be readily controlled today, both luminance noise and chromatic noise.

In many DSLRs, the most noise dependent variable is exposure and people tend to not give proper exposure the proper amount of attention.

No, I do not know anymore about the noise level of the commercial D300s than does anyone else at this point. I suspect that we will all know more in six months. If I were truly worried about this, I would simply wait to evaluate this from what others say about their real experience and from what you determine from hands on use of a D300, loan or rental. Frankly, this would not be a concern of mine from my own experience with several digital Nikon DSLRs. And, yes I know that the consensus opinion is that Nikons tend to have higher noise than do Canons. These are both good cameras and their are pros and cons to both and the odds are that no two Nikon bodies will have the same.identical noise level just like no two identical cars drive the same.

Tom


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
Tom Swaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum > The Photographer > Photography Talk »


Bookmarks
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who has pre ordered a d300 or d3 D.Rodgers Nikon Forum 24 10-02-2007 11:05 AM
D300, D3 First Contact Max@Home Nikon Forum 6 09-25-2007 12:40 AM
Nikon D300 - Ordered! Ken-L Nikon Forum 3 09-24-2007 05:53 AM
D300 JDArt Nikon Forum 14 09-06-2007 03:51 PM
D3 and D300 are out aam1234 Nikon Forum 40 08-29-2007 03:13 PM