![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Alpaca
|
Which crop factor would you PREFER in your main camera?
__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Camel Breath
|
Currently using what I voted for. A 20D (1.6) and 5D (FF), though honestly I can live with just the 5D, but using both to avoid changing lenses often.
|
|
__________________
It's all about light, my friend. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Camel Breath
|
I actually find the 1.3x crop of the 1D Mark II to be quite nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
F1 Camel
|
I like the 1.3 over the 1.6 that I have used
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
senses working overtime
|
I have 2x crop factor (which isn't in the poll) on the Olympus E-1, and 1x crop factor on the 5D. Uninterestingly enough, I like both. The 2x is excellent on long lenses without suffering the physical length (e.g. a 450mm lens hand held " f/3.5), and the WA is useful on the 5D, though the vignetting can be significant wide open. I still believe that we're nowhere near a perfect FF solution in digital, but it's not as bad as I'd originally feared. FF has to be the future I feel so long as the sensors improve and make best use of current 'film era' lenses at all apertures, It's still early days...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Photocamel Master
|
While I'd love to be shooting full frame cameras, it's not cost effective (or intelligent) at the moment for me to do so.* I trade a stop of relative DOF with my 1.5x crop cameras, but a 400mm suddenly becomes adequate for most field sports, with a 600mm being gravy.* Eventually, I want to be using full frame, as I can always get a longer lens while it's not always easy to back-up for wider shots, but not right now.
Still, I voted for 1.0x, as I want my digital Nikon FM/FE cameras one day. An FF manual DSLR replacing my FM2 would go great with my 20mm f/2.8 and 105mm f/1.8. I actually wouldn't mind a 1.5x crop sensor, but I'd prefer to have the old fields of view back. |
|
__________________
-Michael Nikon V1 (Black), Nikon V1 (White), Nikon J1/WP-N1 (Red) , Nikon Coolpix AW100 (Orange) and Apple iPhone 4 (White) Find me on the web: Michael Chen Photo |Blog ("coming soon" since before the dinosaurs roamed the Earth)|SportsShooter | California Wildlife |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Dromedary
|
I voted "other" because I really don't care, as long as it works.
|
|
__________________
Jon Scott Visual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Photocamel Master
|
I agree, Jon. The crop factor just doesn't mean anything to me. I'm more interested in what's in my viewfinder. Then again, I have a FF sensor so I don't worry about "crop factor". When I had a 1.6 camera, I didn't do mental calculations to figure out what my field of view was in relation to a camera I wasn't using...I just took the pictures.
__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features. |
|
__________________
----- If it ain't one thing, it's another. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Share this topic: |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| To Crop, Or Not To Crop.... | Winnie | Image Editing, Color Management, Workflow | 9 | 02-07-2006 03:12 PM |
| winter crop | martin-images | Black-and-White | 2 | 01-13-2006 08:52 PM |
| Camera weight & fatigue factor | marsha7 | Photography Talk | 22 | 10-26-2005 12:43 PM |
| trying to understand crop factor | hartcons | Photography Talk | 4 | 07-19-2005 11:33 AM |