Tamron? Sigma?
PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
 

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photography Forum > Cameras and Lenses > Other Cameras and Lenses

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-2016   #1
Vicuna
 
Location: Manassas Park City
Posts: 152
CamelKarma: 27704
Editing OK?: Yes
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Tamron? Sigma?

Question:
Sigma 70-200 2.8 vs Tamron

I've researched online for a few days. (and this forum as well) General consensus is that the Tamron is a bit sharper, but the Sigma is more durable and has a bit less vignetting, and seems to focus a tad faster. This seems to be the "average opinion", as there are videos and opinion articles all over the place.

My purpose is "semi-professional", meaning I am getting my photog biz started much of which is portrait oriented and senior high.

I need a better 200 than the kit lens, but definitely do not have the cost of a new or used Nikon/Nikkor.

My question is if anyone has any direct experience with either or both of these lenses, and your opinion on each/both. I don't think that they are terribly far apart in capabilities, and I'm inclined to go for sharper (Tamron), but would like some first hand information if possible.

Your comments would be greatly appreciated.

__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register for your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
mdwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018   #2
Photocamel Master
 
Dirk's Avatar
 
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7,564
CamelKarma: 901196
Editing OK?: Ask First
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Tamron? Sigma?

i have both brands , tamron is in my view sharper but sigma is good too .the lenses of tamron and sigma are good , and give enough to please your choice

older tamron and sigma may have issues with the latest gear from nikon
__________________
Life is too short to miss a picture
Dirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2018   #3
F1 Camel
 
Golem's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,752
CamelKarma: 581653
Editing OK?: Yes
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Tamron? Sigma?

`

@MDWINE:

If I've read the OP correctly, you've done your research
and have decided that a marginal increase in sharpness
is worth an increase in vignetting and a decrease in lens
sturdiness, for "semi-professional" application.

Assuming your research is solid then your logic is NOT.
IOW, I'd hire you as a researcher, but not as an adviser.
Golem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2018   #4
Photocamel Master
 
scoundrel1728's Avatar
 
Location: Oakland, CA, USA
Posts: 9,704
CamelKarma: 1461679
Editing OK?: Ask First
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Tamron? Sigma?

You can get a used Nikon 70-200 mm f/2.8 VR or VR II for about USD1200 from KEH, but you might need to buy the tripod foot or lens hood separately if you do that. Since you intend to use this lens for weddings and other events, you will most likely be handholding a lot, or at most using something like a monopod. For this reason, I would strongly suggest getting something with VR (nikon) VC (Tamron) or OS (Sigma) capability. Sigma and Tamron have both had issues with some of their lens models in the past, but Sigma has upped its game on its new stuff and Sigma also builds some stuff that simply doesn't exist in other lens makers' lines. If you need a 200-500 mm f/2.8, for example, Sigma is the only game in town. (This lens also comes with a first-class teleconverter, but these lenses are also really big, heavy, and expensive, and are very rarely necessary for shooting a wedding.)

I am not sure what you mean by "semi-professional" but if you buy a lens like this, you will most likely be living with it for several years at least, so choose wisely and don't compromise your long-range goals for short-range ones. In other words, get the best lens you can afford, even if it means putting off the purchase for a year or two.

The quality of a Tamron or Sigma lens may or may not fit your long-range ambitions, but that depends on how much you pixel peep and how you use your lens and the properties of your individual copy of the lens model you select. I have a 1990 vintage Canon 80-200 mm f/2.8 that works very well but weighs a ton and lacks IS (Canon-speak for VR). I also have a Sigma 150-500 mm f/5-6.3 OS lens that is strictly an outdoor lens because of its low light-gathering power and very long focal length range, especially on an APS-C imager.
scoundrel1728 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2018   #5
F1 Camel
 
Narsuitus's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,773
CamelKarma: 31066
Editing OK?: Ask First
Constructive Critique?: Yes
Default Re: Tamron? Sigma?

@MDWINE:

What did you decide?

How is your portrait oriented senior high photography business going?


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register for your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
Narsuitus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photography Forum > Cameras and Lenses > Other Cameras and Lenses »


Share this topic:

Thread Tools
Display Modes