No sign of the 70-300 AF-S VR - PhotoCamel

Nikonfreak · 02-27-2006

Well there's a picture floating around of this lens, but no announcement as of yet from Nikon.

Is it internet roumor or is it real?

Julio

www.pbase.com/loansharkx

cyclohexane · 02-27-2006

I'm hoping it's real, as 70-300 is a very useful travel range, currently occupied by two lenses that could be much, much better.* The optics had better be improved, though, or else I'd just skip it.

Nikonfreak · 02-28-2006

Well, the hope is there.

I believe the "leaked" photo showed a 70-300 with the same aperature range, but with AF-S, VR and the nano crystal coating.

If so, perhaps they've improved the optics a tad.

I have the old version, and while the bokeh isn't much to sing and dance about, the lens was fine so long as you know it's limitations. It definitely isn't a low light lens and was somewhat slow focusing. In bright daylight conditions it was adequate and had a great range, was light, and you certainly could pack it along anywhere.

Julio

02-27-2006	#1 (permalink)
Nikonfreak F1 Camel Location: South Florida Posts: 3,114 CamelKarma: 1168 Editing OK?: Ask first Gallery \| Blog	No sign of the 70-300 AF-S VR Well there's a picture floating around of this lens, but no announcement as of yet from Nikon. Is it internet roumor or is it real? Julio www.pbase.com/loansharkx __________________ Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
	__________________ I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of 'taking care' of them. - Thomas Jefferson

02-27-2006	#2 (permalink)
cyclohexane Photocamel Master Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California Posts: 5,149 CamelKarma: 1065 Editing OK?: Ask first Gallery \| Blog	Re: No sign of the 70-300 AF-S VR I'm hoping it's real, as 70-300 is a very useful travel range, currently occupied by two lenses that could be much, much better.* The optics had better be improved, though, or else I'd just skip it.
	__________________ -Michael

02-28-2006	#3 (permalink)
Nikonfreak F1 Camel Location: South Florida Posts: 3,114 CamelKarma: 1168 Editing OK?: Ask first Gallery \| Blog	Re: No sign of the 70-300 AF-S VR Well, the hope is there. I believe the "leaked" photo showed a 70-300 with the same aperature range, but with AF-S, VR and the nano crystal coating. If so, perhaps they've improved the optics a tad. I have the old version, and while the bokeh isn't much to sing and dance about, the lens was fine so long as you know it's limitations. It definitely isn't a low light lens and was somewhat slow focusing. In bright daylight conditions it was adequate and had a great range, was light, and you certainly could pack it along anywhere. Julio __________________ Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
	__________________ I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of 'taking care' of them. - Thomas Jefferson

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Building Sign	Tuna	Black-and-White	2	10-24-2006 03:17 AM
Joe's Liquor Store Sign	Padre	Street / Urban / Performance / Photojournalism	4	10-19-2006 06:25 PM
My sign in expires every time I visit Photocamel	rpcrowe	Suggestions / Questions	5	06-30-2006 04:46 PM
Finally, a sign of Spring - Michigan Mud!	Kevin Barrett	All Other Styles, Types	2	03-16-2006 03:47 AM