PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
Photo of the Week Photo of the Week

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community > Cameras and Lenses > Nikon Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2007   #1 (permalink)
Vicuna
 
Location: Barry, South Wales.
Posts: 53
LilPeteMordino will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 12
Default 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

Hey guys. Im planning on picking up a new lens around about christmas time. My choices are the 18-200mm VR (£500ish) and the 70-300mm VR (£400ish).

My question is, Out of these two lenses, Which would people go for. Is the 18-200mm VR that much better that it is worth the extra hundred pounds? What do people think of these two lenses aswell?

Would be used for general use as I dont shoot primarily one 'genre' and will be used with a D50.

Thanking you kindly.

__________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
LilPeteMordino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007   #2 (permalink)
MrB
Bactrian
 
MrB's Avatar
 
Location: California
Posts: 1,918
MrB has a reputation beyond reputeMrB has a reputation beyond reputeMrB has a reputation beyond reputeMrB has a reputation beyond reputeMrB has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 420
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

I think the 18-200 will give you more flexibility in the wide angle end, but the 70-300 will give you better range for birds and wildlife. I have the 70-300 and like it a lot except I can't get far enough from the subject on the short end. I am planning to add the 18-200, replacing my 18-70.
__________________
Equipment: Nikon D80, 18-200 VR, Nikkor AF-S 70-300 VR, AF Micro Nikkor 105, 50mm 1.8, SB800
MrB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007   #3 (permalink)
Alpaca
 
Posts: 13
Blues will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 10
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

I can't offer any solid information, only my intentions. I too have been contemplating a similar matter, but between the 18-135 and the 18-200, and I am opting to go with the 18-200mm VR. However, if I had the $ I would opt for the 55-300mm since I have an 18-70mm. Do you already have a solid lens for 18-70? If so, I'd go for the 300mm.

Best of luck either way.
Blues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007   #4 (permalink)
Dromedary
 
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,122
Tom Swaman has a brilliant futureTom Swaman has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 194
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

If you want the best combination for good shooting, ease of handling and range coverage at the overall best cost, your optimum selection ought to be the 18-135mm and the 70-300mm VR. Do not forget that it is relatively easy and relatively inexpensive to acquire primes and zooms in the say 24 to 70mm that are optically excellent.

Tom
Tom Swaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007   #5 (permalink)
Vicuna
 
Location: Barry, South Wales.
Posts: 53
LilPeteMordino will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 12
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

At the moment I only have the 18-55mm 'kit' Lens.

Would you say the 2 lenses (18-200 and 70-300) are of the same quality, but just a bit more zoom and the likes?

Its where I'm really wondering where to go as I dont have any 'real' genre of shooting. I want to try everything.

Thanks.
LilPeteMordino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007   #6 (permalink)
Dromedary
 
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,122
Tom Swaman has a brilliant futureTom Swaman has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 194
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

I would say that both lenses are of good quality and I have owned and used both as has my wife. If you need long telephoto, you will do best with the 70-300 VR. Have you considered trading your 18-55mm and considering my earlier recommendation? You will be miles ahead.

Tom
Tom Swaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007   #7 (permalink)
Vicuna
 
Location: Barry, South Wales.
Posts: 53
LilPeteMordino will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 12
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

Yeah, I did read that. But at the moment I wouldnt be able to afford to buy one and pay the difference on the other.

Will go back and have a think and another look!

Thanks.
LilPeteMordino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007   #8 (permalink)
F1 Camel
 
Location: Jax FL
Posts: 2,841
badpickev has a reputation beyond reputebadpickev has a reputation beyond reputebadpickev has a reputation beyond reputebadpickev has a reputation beyond reputebadpickev has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 425
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

i think with the 18-55 i would look at the 70-300. the gap between 55 and 70 may not be missed
__________________
Fuji S2/S3/S5 Pro
Kenko MC7 2X, Pro 300
Nkkor 50 1.8 70-300VR
Phoenix 100, 650-1300& Sima 100mm F2 SF
Sigma 12-24, 18-50 HSM, 18-125, 50-500, 70-300, 120-300, 1.4X 2x
Tamron 28-75
badpickev is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007   #9 (permalink)
dgs
Vicuna
 
dgs's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 225
dgs has a spectacular aura about
CamelKarma: 37
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

I still like the idea of an 18-200, and then add a 80-400, to me that would be a great combo.

thanks,
Danny
__________________
I am a hobbyist and can take brutally honest critiques. I just request you tell me how to fix it, or how you edited it!
dgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007   #10 (permalink)
Vicuna
 
fintastic's Avatar
 
Posts: 206
fintastic is just really nice
CamelKarma: 57
Default Re: 18-200mm VR or 70-300mm VR

Everyone need to sort the type of shooting they do out for them self. That said I have both lenses and use the 18-200 far more ! When I shoot sports I will use a 80-200 2.8 and last choice is the 70-300.

Just my 2 cents.

John

__________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
d-200 D50 80-200 2.8 18-200 vr 70-300 sb800
fintastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community > Cameras and Lenses > Nikon Forum »


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
300mm f/2.8 Leehman Portraits / People 0 07-09-2007 08:50 PM
70-300mm VR? LilPeteMordino Nikon Forum 19 07-03-2007 06:29 PM
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG APO IF HSM Kevin Barrett Other SLR Cameras and Lenses 6 04-22-2006 12:44 PM
A few E-1 + 300mm f/2.8 tomh1000 Four Thirds Forum 9 08-04-2005 07:19 AM
Candid with 300mm 2.8 RobAmy Portraits / People 5 07-21-2005 09:46 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.



SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0