![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Alpaca
|
I was wandering what would be a better investment to buy the Cokin filters that can be used with multiple lenses or the filters that screw on. Is the quality any better for the screw on filters than the Cokin filters or do the people just want to buy the screw filters for every size lens they have.
__________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Guanaco
|
I have filters for 58mm, 62mm, 67mm, and 77mm. I'll likely add 39mm soon, and possibly 72mm (if I break down and buy the 35-70 2.
. I get the most use out of the 67mm and 77mm filters (ie. my mid-range and telephoto zooms). The only reason I'd use a Cokin system is for their Graduated ND filters since they're so much more adjustable than a typical round filter.The problem with a cokin filter system is that in order to buy one setup for all of your lenses you'll need to buy the largest one. This would be horribly cumbersome on say the 50mm 1.8. It also gets rid of your ability to use most lens hoods. Oh, and you can't buy B+W and Singh-Ray for a Cokin system ![]() Obviously there are advantages to using either system. The best thing to do would probably be to pick up a good Cokin setup that will cover your less used filters for multiple lenses, and then your more common filters can be purchased for each lens in the screw-in form. I have circular polarizers on my lenses almost all of the time. They're definitely expensive, but I also don't have to move my filters in between lenses. |
|
__________________
Nikon D300 | D70 | FA | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Nikon 80-200 2.8 | 50mm 1.8 | 300mm f/4 | 18-70 | SB-600 Washington state, USA my photos - Joel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
I use the Cokin P holder, but I do not recommend Cokin filters anymore. Their Grad Gray filters are not neutral and add a slight cast to the image. I recommend Lee's or Hitech filters. They make 85mm filters to fit the the Cokin holder, or you can buy their holder.
|
|
__________________
¿ <°)))))>< |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Alpaca
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Dromedary
|
I have used Lee Gel Filters for years as I have not liked Cokin Filters.
Frankly, while on the subject of filters, I would like any information on the quality of Hoya Filters, please. When I started in photography we used Tiffen, B + W, Schott and Zeiss filters. Then Tiffen filters became sketchy in quality and lots of reported artifacts resulted. Today, there are few Schott and Zeiss filters available for cameras and Hoya Filters seem to have become ubiquitous. How is their quality ??Thanks, Tom |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
ND filters? - Canon Digital Photography Forums
Color cast is the issue. it turns out Coking "neutral gray" are not neutral. |
|
__________________
¿ <°)))))>< |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Dromedary
|
Quote:
Cheers/Mike P.S. John, it is Cokin, not Coking. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
__________________
My Gallery |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
I ran a test on it, and there was a slight cast. I still use one of my .6 soft grad Cokins, with no issue. There used to be images demonstrating the issue in that thread, but not anymore (long gone). All that remains are my corrections to Niel's raw file.
|
|
__________________
¿ <°)))))>< |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Llama
|
So far the only complaint that I have is that they are getting scratch in those plastic carriers that they come in. It has not shone up in the picks yet. But with the admitidly crappy kit lens that I have, it could be there and I would not be able to see it.
Do the Lees have better carriers? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Guanaco
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
Nikon D300 | D70 | FA | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Nikon 80-200 2.8 | 50mm 1.8 | 300mm f/4 | 18-70 | SB-600 Washington state, USA my photos - Joel |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Vicuna
|
I have Cokin grad gray filters and didn't use them much because of the color cast, especially using Velvia 50 which gave a strong magenta cast. When I started using digital I tried them because I could get instant feedback on their effect. First thing I noticed was...Very little
color cast! My thoughts are that the white ballance is adjusting and minimizing the color cast. You do not have to buy the largest holders for cokin filters, the "P" system will easely cover 77mm. As mentioned, probably the worst reason to use cokin is for the ND Grads, especially for film. Cokin also makes hoods which work well and you can order Singh-Ray filters for the "P" system. The holders and filters are not horribly cumbersome, although if you have a front mount that turns during focusing or zooming it will be an inconvience due to disorientation of the holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
F1 Camel
|
Quote:
For other things I like other brands and such. I try to keep to the 77mm size for the most part as the common size for much of my glass. (Nik) Julio |
|
|
__________________
The world is full of dreamers. And rightfully so, God created us that way. But at some point in our lives, we have the choice: to keep the dream for sleeping, or to wake up and live it. |
||
|
|
|