Some D200 images and specs taken from the Nikon UK site

[Paul Shields]

Nikon D200 Full Specifications

* DX Format with 12.4 effective megapixels

* The new CMOS image sensor features high image quality and high-speed 4-channel data output

* New image processing algorithms combine with optimized analog and digital white balance to produce smoother, more consistent gradations with exceptionally pure color reproduction

* Continuous shooting: 3 frames per second (fps) at 12.4 megapixels for up to 10 consecutive NEF (Nikon Electronic Format) images; 5 fps for 18 NEF images at 6.8 megapixels

* 3D-Color Matrix Metering II with ambient light sensor and 1,005-pixel RGB sensor further improves on Nikon’s acclaimed exposure metering system

* High-speed, high-precision 11-area AF system with 9 cross-type AF sensors deliver quick response and sharp focus, even under the most challenging shooting conditions

* Two new Adobe RGB color modes further expand professional color space options and also support for sYCC color space

* Excellent response with instant power-up and ultra-fast 52ms shutter release lag

* Top shutter speed of 1/8,000 second and flash sync speeds up to 1/250 second

* Faster read/write speed for the memory card and a USB 2.0 Hi-Speed interface for faster image transfer

* Large 2.5-inch LCD monitor for easy access to settings and information, as well as clear, flicker-free image preview
* Creative in-camera effects, Image Overlay and Multiple Exposure

* Functions such as World Time, automatic rotation of vertical compositions expand possibilities
* Lightweight, durable magnesium body

* Full support for Nikon’s Creative Lighting System when used with the SB-800 or SB-600 Speedlights

* In addition to DX Nikkor lenses, the D200 supports more than 50 AF Nikkor lenses

* Nikon’s PictureProject software is included, enabling easy control over image adjustment and management

* Support for Nikon Capture 4 (version 4.3), a software application with the tools to assist the professional photographer

* NEF (RAW) format for the utmost in versatile, effective image control and correction

* JPEG and NEF (RAW) Combination Filing System enables simultaneous recording of NEF and JPEG data for the same shot

[AlbertP]

Very cool, Paul. What is that weird thing on the lens? A flash?

[Paul Shields]

I think it's a raygun, but don't quote me on that .

[JDArt]

Impressive specs. Does anyone know who makes the sensor? And I take it that this is still the 1.5x crop factor?

[Hokum]

That looks bloody awesome!

its a mini D2X!

[digiguy]

what the hell is all the fuss over? Where's the FF ?

LOL

[Kevin Barrett]

Originally Posted by JDArt

Impressive specs. Does anyone know who makes the sensor? And I take it that this is still the 1.5x crop factor?

Well, I have to admit it does look impressive! *

[AlbertP]

Originally Posted by digiguy

what the hell is all the fuss over? Where's the FF ?

LOL

Clearly Nikon is simply turning its back on full frame. It's really a pity, too, since those old Nikon lenses like the 85mm f/1.4 really come to life on the type of camera they were built for. I'm sorry to see Nikon stick with these 1.5x sensor cameras.

[digiguy]

I think they've made a big mistake but what do I know, good luck to them

[Kevin Barrett]

I think the D200 will do well (especially if it's priced right). There are many DX (1.5x) fans out there and it should be a fine platform, especially for tele work. If the reviews and field performance support what initially appears to be an impressive camera, the D200 could expand it's marketshare even further in the 20D/5D space (prosumer/pro).

Canon's answer will come in early 2006.*

[Paul Shields]

Personally I think it looks great, which is why I posted it here. Though I love my Oly E-1, it's nice to see other 'smaller frame' cameras with large MPs out there. Specs look very good.

Any indication of potential cost?

[Ryder]

Originally Posted by AlbertP

Clearly Nikon is simply turning its back on full frame. It's really a pity, too, since those old Nikon lenses like the 85mm f/1.4 really come to life on the type of camera they were built for. I'm sorry to see Nikon stick with these 1.5x sensor cameras.

Hi:

On the contrary. Nikon will almost certainly have a FF offering at a later date. You can't do it all and do it well. They are taking advantage of all the R&D that goes into the 1.5x sensors. The D2x clearly shows that this is a viable system for all but the most hell bent wide angle pros doesn't it? *

It would be foolish and costly for Nikon to retool just cuz Canon does. They do not have the funds that Canon does. Canon's FF offering at 1500 more than the price quoted for the D200(2k) is really a camera with a lot of limitations. The D200, if the spec and pics are to be believed is a much nicer camera IMHO for most applications.

Lets see how it handles 1600ISO

(my first post here so please be kind!)

wow... a spell check!
Cheers
Craig Ryder

[AlbertP]

Hi, Craig. Welcome to the board.

I guess there is something to be said for Nikon's consistency in the crop-factor area. My biggest complaint is that the lens ranges are now all messed up with the cropped sensors. The 85 used to be a perfect portrait lens. Now it's often too long.

[Paul Shields]

Originally Posted by Ryder

On the contrary. Nikon will almost certainly have a FF offering at a later date. You can't do it all and do it well. They are taking advantage of all the R&D that goes into the 1.5x sensors. The D2x clearly shows that this is a viable system for all but the most hell bent wide angle pros doesn't it?

It would be foolish and costly for Nikon to retool just cuz Canon does. They do not have the funds that Canon does. Canon's FF offering at 1500 more than the price quoted for the D200(2k) is really a camera with a lot of limitations. The D200, if the spec and pics are to be believed is a much nicer camera IMHO for most applications.

I think you're spot on with your analysis - there is definitely life left in the DX format. I think it shows Nikon have the guts to stick to their principles. Oh and welcome to PhotoCamel - I hope you can stick around .

[digiguy]

Originally Posted by Ryder

It would be foolish and costly for Nikon to retool just cuz Canon does. They do not have the funds that Canon does. Canon's FF offering at 1500 more than the price quoted for the D200(2k) is really a camera with a lot of limitations.

I dont understand what limitations does the 5D have? I think it's pretty cool. I'm sure this new nikon is cool too but how do you know if it is without limitations?

[Hokum]

"full frame" or what ever are just man made sizes. I'd argue the 1.5 crop of the nikos is full frame... its nikon Dslr Full frame...

Saying something is bad cuse its not FF i, could just say come on canon where my medium format full frame...

BTW on Price i heard £1750 being bandied about

[Alice Morrison]

Nikon's 1.5 "full frame" would be fine if it weren't for the fact, as Albert says, that the majority of Nikon's lens lengths were made with a different sized imaging apparatus in mind. Sure, if like Olympus Nikon had redesigned all of their lenses to "match" the current sensor, then I doubt there would be an issue here at all.

[Ryder]

Originally Posted by digiguy

I don't understand what limitations does the 5D have? I think it's pretty cool. I'm sure this new nikon is cool too but how do you know if it is without limitations?

Hi:

I agree.... it is cool!

I admit there is a bit of speculation here but my guess would be that at $1,500 less that the 5D the D200 will have better 1) speed (at least at a reduced mp which is a nice feature for action shooters of all types), 2) flash capabilities, and likely 3) focusing (this remains to be seen).

Don't get me wrong though. The 5D is a great camera and I really hate the Canon v Nikon thing. The 5D is just expensive as it is the first of its kind. Firsts are almost always expensive.

And, to say it has limitations is not really correct. I agree with you. It is a great landscape/portrait camera. I'd certainly choose something else for sports or birds (Nikon or Canon). Maybe it is just that the Camera does what it does and all cameras have "limitations"...you just pick the ones you want to live with.

Nonetheless, I think most folks ( especially amateurs on a budget like me) would choose to live with the D200 (as advertised) rather than the 5D. It will do more things really well for less $$.

PS Thanks all for the welcome!!

Cheers,
Craig Ryder

[Ryder]

Originally Posted by AlbertP

Hi, Craig. Welcome to the board.

I guess there is something to be said for Nikon's consistency in the crop-factor area. My biggest complaint is that the lens ranges are now all messed up with the cropped sensors. The 85 used to be a perfect portrait lens. Now it's often too long.

Hi:

That is a real problem. Folks who carefully selected, bought, and learned to work with a certain group of lenses for FF are in no-man's land.

I can see how they feel left behind bt Nikon in a way.

Cheers
Craig Ryder

[Hokum]

I persinally prefer cropped cameras over FF. As a birder and wildlife shooter the extra reach for "free" is a geat benefit!