Sigma 28-200mm 3.5-5.6 D Lens

davidmb · 08-30-2005

Has anyone used this lens? Sigma 28-200mm 3.5-5.6 D Lens

badpickev · 09-01-2005

here is a good place to start.

http://photographyreview.com/cat/len...9_3128crx.aspx

hartcons · 09-06-2005

I have a quantaray 28-200 3.5-5.6 and I think it's a sigma under the hood (made for Ritz Cameras). It's not always razor sharp and I have seen some purple fringing but overall I like the look of the pictures I get from it (nice blurring) and I like the overall handling and ergonomics. 28-200 is a nice walkabout range if you don't need to go really wide or really long. These days, though, I'm tending to use my Nikon 24-120 VR lens more often. The more experienced I get the more I appreciate fast lenses (low F) and/or vibration reduction and/or close focusing.

Here's one of my favorites with the quantaray:

JDArt · 09-06-2005

Beautiful shot.

08-30-2005	#1
davidmb Alpaca Posts: 20 CamelKarma: 11 Gallery \| Blog	Sigma 28-200mm 3.5-5.6 D Lens Has anyone used this lens? Sigma 28-200mm 3.5-5.6 D Lens __________________ Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
davidmb Alpaca Posts: 20 CamelKarma: 11 Gallery \| Blog

09-01-2005	#2
badpickev F1 Camel Location: Jax FL Posts: 4,174 CamelKarma: 1676 Editing OK?: Yes Gallery \| Blog	Re: Sigma 28-200mm 3.5-5.6 D Lens here is a good place to start. http://photographyreview.com/cat/len...9_3128crx.aspx
	__________________ Fuji S2/S3/S5 Pro Kenko MC7 2X, Pro 300 Nkkor 50 1.8 70-300VR Phoenix 100, 650-1300& Sima 100mm F2 SF Sigma 12-24, 18-50 HSM, 18-125, 50-500, 70-300, 120-300, 1.4X 2x Tamron 28-75

09-06-2005	#3
hartcons Guanaco Posts: 427 CamelKarma: 32 Gallery \| Blog	Re: Sigma 28-200mm 3.5-5.6 D Lens I have a quantaray 28-200 3.5-5.6 and I think it's a sigma under the hood (made for Ritz Cameras). It's not always razor sharp and I have seen some purple fringing but overall I like the look of the pictures I get from it (nice blurring) and I like the overall handling and ergonomics. 28-200 is a nice walkabout range if you don't need to go really wide or really long. These days, though, I'm tending to use my Nikon 24-120 VR lens more often. The more experienced I get the more I appreciate fast lenses (low F) and/or vibration reduction and/or close focusing. Here's one of my favorites with the quantaray:
	__________________ Oregon, USA<br />Even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut.

09-06-2005	#4
JDArt PhotoCamel Supporter Camel Breath Location: Far out, man Posts: 22,872 CamelKarma: 247010 Editing OK?: Yes Gallery \| Blog	Re: Sigma 28-200mm 3.5-5.6 D Lens Beautiful shot. __________________ Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
	__________________ My Camel Blog \| Friend PhotoCamel \| Follow PhotoCamel

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
70-200mm f/4L IS - a lens that will never be produced - boy was I wrong!	rpcrowe	Canon Forum	10	02-17-2007 08:46 AM
NEW - Canon EF70-200mm f/4L IS USM lens	stevemost	Canon Forum	31	09-02-2006 12:02 PM
Repair or replace 28-200mm Lens?	mbanstendig	Canon Forum	4	03-14-2006 11:48 AM