![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guanaco
|
Ok, so let's say I have a 4x6 print made at Ritz from a roll of film. Then I want to scan that print on my flatbed scanner which goes up to 600dpi. Is there 600dpi worth of data in that 4x6 print or are you just telling the scanner to make stuff up when you choose a resolution that high? Would you be able to get more data from the film negative? I think Nikon has a film scanner that claims to do a whopping 4,000 dpi.
If you do a digital print on a home inkjet printer I wonder if that would tend to have any more/less data in it than a film lab print. if you're doing scanning you might want to check out http://www.hamrick.com/ (it gives me better scans than the canon photoshop plug-in that came with my scanner). __________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
__________________
Oregon, USA<br />Even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
I have always figured that scanning a negative is a better option. If you scaned a 4 x 6 at 600dpi, you'd end up at 2400 x 3600 pixels.
A 35mm negative (24x36mm) equates out to a 0.945 x 1.417 inch negative, scanned at 4000dpi would get you a pixel count of 3780 x 5668. I also think you using a negative scanner gives you a higher color depth. Maybe part of the scan being better is that the negative is scanned against a light source behind it, where a print is a reflective image ![]() __________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scanning slides - which route to take? | M. Worthington | Photography Talk | 5 | 05-16-2006 03:21 PM |
| Batch Saving in .psd when scanning into PSD CS2 from 9000 ED? | mbanstendig | Computers and Software | 1 | 03-20-2006 08:36 AM |
| Cleaning Negatives For Scanning | Jon Foster | Image Editing and Color Management | 3 | 10-26-2005 08:46 PM |
| Negative Scanning? | Jon Foster | Image Editing and Color Management | 1 | 10-26-2005 08:42 PM |
| Will digital B&W Prints ever be like Film B&W prints? | photosbymorgan2 | Photography Talk | 18 | 09-16-2005 10:58 PM |