To All You Film Shooters

[blumesan]

We are certainly in the minority, but I know that there are still some of you out there on the Camel. Since we rarely, if ever, see images posted in this forum I assume that when you have photos to post you go to the appropriate Photography by Genre forum. That is as it should be. But when you post a image do you include the information that the image was captured on film?

I have a suggestion: When you post an image captured on film, insert a new thread in THIS forum, referencing the forum and thread title where the image can be found. If you know how, you can also include a link to the image. Also, either here or with the image, please include information on camera, lens, film type and how it was scanned.

I have a hunch that there are more than a few images floating around on the Camel which noone realizes were taken with a film camera. Let's toot our horn.
Cheers/Mike

[photojazz54]

100% in agreement...will take teh Fs (4 and 5) out this weekend and post some.

[Thunderhawk]

I should have been posting here. All I shoot is film. I do how ever make it a point to state that the shots were film.

This is a shot of a kitty I had some 30 years ago, her name was Pepper. This was scaned from a very old print on a HP photosmart C4180 all in one. I have the slide and it still looks pretty good. Shot on a Canon AE1 with a 50mm f1.8 hand held with a sunpak flash. Kodacrome asa 25 (or was it 64?) color slide film.

[R. House]

Fuji Velvia 100 scanned on a Minolta Dual III. Polarizing filter w/ Tamron 28-105 zoom @ 28mm. Nikon f90x.

[Thunderhawk]

Originally Posted by R. House

Fuji Velvia 100 scanned on a Minolta Dual III. Polarizing filter w/ Tamron 28-105 zoom @ 28mm. Nikon f90x.

WOW!...Maybe I`ll try that Fu film.

[blumesan]

For another on Fuji Velvia 100 see:
Hidden Arch, Kodachrome Basin SP

[Sidebyte]

From my recent vacation on the Caribbean Coast of Colombia, shot with my 1966 Canon FTQL, Kodak 100 with a Canon 50mm F1.8. On the first image you will see a faint line running horizontally across top of the image. This line is not on the film, it must have been a fault in the scanner?

[nemo]

It appears that there is a faint line running vertically in the second pic. Looks to be in the same spot in relation to the first pic. Could be the scanner, but certainly looks like a scratch in the film.

[HuBBaTheMan]

I had that on an old minolta once and it was the film-path that was damaged causing the scratching on the film. So watch that carefully as it will ruin the films.

*Edit. Just saw you mentioned it was in the scanner. nevermind

[Sidebyte]

Originally Posted by nemo

It appears that there is a faint line running vertically in the second pic. Looks to be in the same spot in relation to the first pic. Could be the scanner, but certainly looks like a scratch in the film.

The film is clean but just as a precaution I checked and cleaned the camera....no sign of a burr or any other appurtenance so has to be the scanner.

[Thunderhawk]

Originally Posted by Sidebyte

The film is clean but just as a precaution I checked and cleaned the camera....no sign of a burr or any other appurtenance so has to be the scanner.

My scaner does that all the time.... But not on every pic. If I rescan it, it most likely would be fine...Nice shots you have there.

[MDa Re]

I just now noticed this thread and I think it's great. I use probably 98.9 % film and believe I always will. This was taken my Yashica GSN and Kodak bw400cn film. The GSN has a fixed 45mm f1.7 lens. The other photos in my gallery were taken with my Nikon F4s and a Nikkor 50mm MF lens.
All negs were scanned with an Epson Perfection V200. I hope to see more film users posting to this thread because I know that there are more of us out there than everyone believes.


scans000000124a.jpg

[blumesan]

@MDa Re
Welcome to the Camel! Always glad to have more input from film shooters. The shot you posted looks like it could use a little boost in contrast. Do you use any post=processing program?

Cheers/Mike

[MDa Re]

Blumesan, Thanks for the welcome. I usually just adjust the levels with Gimp. I've never really messed with the contrast. I guess I should start.

Michael

[blumesan]

Sorry I'm not familiar with Gimp. Have heard of it, but no experience.

I have taken the liberty of making a quick adjustment of your image using Photoshop, curves and a bit of sharpening. If you object to my messing with your image just let me know and I will remove it.

Cheers/Mike

[photojazz54]

Hi, glad you started this thread. Wanted to add my film shots.

Captured with Nikon F4 or F5 and scanned with Epson 3170.

F4
fiat1.jpg

F5
f7porsche.jpg

F5
f4iage.jpg

[MDa Re]

Blumesan
I don't mind people bettering my photos at all. Gimp is the PS equivalent for Linux. It does most of the same stuff. Interface a little strange to get used to though.

Michael

[Kiron Kid]

Anything I've ever posted in the Camel. has been shot on film.

Kiron Kid

[Kiron Kid]

Here are a few film snaps.

Scenics-stuff,etc. - a set on Flickr

Kiron Kid

[Kiron Kid]

Originally Posted by R. House

Fuji Velvia 100 scanned on a Minolta Dual III. Polarizing filter w/ Tamron 28-105 zoom @ 28mm. Nikon f90x.

Nice shot. Where was it? Which version of the Tamron 28-105? I have a few Tamron SP lenses, and they are very good.

Velvia 50 with polarizer.

Kiron kid