PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
Photo of the Week Photo of the Week

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community > Cameras and Lenses > Film Camera Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2006   #1 (permalink)
Photocamel Master
 
aam1234's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,515
aam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 479
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Which Film

A recent thread about "film is dead" made me want to try film again.

So which film (no slides) would you recommend. It doesn't have to be anything special just good quality general purpose film, maybe with good color saturation. Prefer Kodak as they are the easiest to get around here. Also, and while we are at it what's a good B&W film.

Thanks

__________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
It's all about light, my friend.
aam1234 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #2 (permalink)
F1 Camel
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: Westwood
Posts: 4,679
cyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 702
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

This is what I was able to get back home: Fuji Superia X-Tra 400 (might be different in your region, but it'll be a "Superia"), Kodak Gold 200/400/800/1600 (used 200; have rolls of unused 800), and Kodak 400CN (C-41 process black-and-white). I haven't been film-shopping here.

My personal favorite was the Fuji Superia, but the Kodak Gold wasn't far behind- the colors just weren't my style: they were fairly "American". The Fuji looked better to my eyes... The colors were a bit more subdued, but still fairly saturated (with correct exposure, naturally), and could be pulled back really nicely from overexposure. The Fuji doesn't really push too well though, and underexposure trades a lot of saturation:



(Leitz 90mm f/2.8 Elmarit wide open)

The poor scan doesn't help matters; it actually looks fairly good in print, and I liked the subdued look it had. The Kodak Gold handled underexposure way better, and I actually really liked this one roll I pushed one stop (color was great), but I don't have any scans from it at the present.

The Kodak 400CN black-and-white was merely okay; it favored subjects with lots of reds. I think it was a Portra-type film, so that makes sense for hiding skin imperfections, but overall, it was pretty bad. Didn't have the tonal width of real black-and-white film:



(20mm f/2.8 AIS Nikkor wide open)

It approximated the look of running channel mixer of a color scan in Photoshop, shown below:



Doing channel mixer is easier, more controllable, and cheaper. A roll of Fuji Superia 400 is about $1.33 a roll, while a roll of the Kodak CN was $3 to $5 a roll. With the color negative, I'd also have a color version!

My take is, if you want to shoot color film, most of the consumer color negative films should get the job done. If you want to shoot black-and-white film, use real black-and-white film, and not color process stuff (unless it's the Ilford I haven't tried, which I hear is good).
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #3 (permalink)
Photocamel Master
 
aam1234's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,515
aam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 479
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

Thanks Michael for the explanation and examples. Well appreciated.
__________________
It's all about light, my friend.
aam1234 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #4 (permalink)
F1 Camel
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: Westwood
Posts: 4,679
cyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 702
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

No problem; I don't actually have that much experience with different films (it's always been Kodak Gold and Fuji Superia- they're cheap), but I'll be shooting different films in the next few years as classes progress, so I'll try to come back and chime in some more- unless the classes let me use the cheap film, which I doubt.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #5 (permalink)
Photocamel Master
 
aam1234's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,515
aam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 479
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

That would be nice. Thanks again.
__________________
It's all about light, my friend.
aam1234 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #6 (permalink)
Former Camel
 
Posts: 1,293
Rokcet Scientist has a spectacular aura about
CamelKarma: 33
Default Re: Which Film

Quote:
Originally Posted by aam1234
So which film (no slides) would you recommend. It doesn't have to be anything special just good quality general purpose film, maybe with good color saturation.
Fuji Velvia is my recommendation then.

But why would you want to go the silver-bromide route again, aam?
Rokcet Scientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #7 (permalink)
Photocamel Master
 
aam1234's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,515
aam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 479
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

Just for fun Smith, and also to compare digital with film, again just for fun. I also miss film to tell you the truth, don't know why.
__________________
It's all about light, my friend.
aam1234 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #8 (permalink)
Former Camel
 
Posts: 1,293
Rokcet Scientist has a spectacular aura about
CamelKarma: 33
Default Re: Which Film

Quote:
Originally Posted by aam1234
[...] to compare digital with film, [...]
That'd be interesting!
Could you do a side-by-side comparison and post 'm here, also side-by-side?
I think that'd be very informative for us Camels (re my postscript).
Rokcet Scientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #9 (permalink)
Photocamel Master
 
aam1234's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,515
aam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 479
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

I only have $30 scanner so that won't be a fair comparison. I'm not even sure it works
__________________
It's all about light, my friend.
aam1234 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #10 (permalink)
Former Camel
 
Posts: 1,293
Rokcet Scientist has a spectacular aura about
CamelKarma: 33
Default Re: Which Film

Quote:
Originally Posted by aam1234
I only have $30 scanner so that won't be a fair comparison.
Sure, it will. If you can do a 300dpi scan*. Most scanners, even the cheapest (if clean and in good working order), are capable of capturing much more information/data/detail than the average hard- and software knows what to do with.

*for digitizing 'old' chemical photo prints, I scan at 600dpi, and apply PP at that resolution.

All on a 15 year old, $30 scanner under ancient Mac OS9 . . .
Like these:




Rokcet Scientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #11 (permalink)
Photocamel Master
 
aam1234's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,515
aam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 479
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

Waw, that's impressive, both the photos and the quality.
__________________
It's all about light, my friend.
aam1234 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #12 (permalink)
F1 Camel
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: Westwood
Posts: 4,679
cyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 702
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

Quote:
Fuji Velvia is my recommendation then.
Unfortunately, Velvia's a slide film. Doesn't fit the criteria.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006   #13 (permalink)
Photocamel Master
 
aam1234's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,515
aam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond reputeaam1234 has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 479
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

You are right Michael.

__________________
It's all about light, my friend.
aam1234 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2006   #14 (permalink)
Alpaca
 
Posts: 49
Confusion Circle will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 14
Default Re: Which Film

I use Fuji Pro 160S for colour, Kodak Tri-x for B&W almost exclusively, but I will use the occasional Ilford XP2, FP4, PAN F.

I also use Kodak HIE and EIR alot.
__________________
Holga, Leica, Minolta & Nikon cameras and a whole bunch of lenses.
Confusion Circle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007   #15 (permalink)
Guanaco
 
kevin_c's Avatar
 
Location: Dorset, England
Posts: 342
kevin_c is a glorious beacon of light
CamelKarma: 79
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

Thought i'd revive an old thread

I tend to use Fuji Superia (200 or 400) for general shooting and Ilford HP5 or FP4 for 'real' Black & White.
IMO the newer 'chromogenic' C41 emulsions from Kodak (BW400CN) and Ilford (XP-2 Super) don't give the same contrast and tones, although of these two I'd go for the Ilford out of preference.
__________________
Kevin
kevin_c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007   #16 (permalink)
F1 Camel
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: Westwood
Posts: 4,679
cyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond reputecyclohexane has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 702
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

By the way, this is what I'm shooting right now:

Fuji Superia, 200 and 400 (I'm running out though)
Kodak Gold 200, 800.
Kodak Ultra Color 400

Of these, I prefer the Fujis; their subdued color sings to me. The Kodak Gold 200 is real nice outside though.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007   #17 (permalink)
Dromedary
 
blumesan's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,188
blumesan has a reputation beyond reputeblumesan has a reputation beyond reputeblumesan has a reputation beyond reputeblumesan has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 335
Default Re: Which Film

Agree with Kevin_c. For B&W the Ilford is really the best. But it depends on getting a good lab to develop it, and that's not always easy. May have to go back to developing my own. I also like the Kodak Gold 200 for landscapes.

Cheers/Mike
blumesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007   #18 (permalink)
Llama
 
Latinbob's Avatar
 
Posts: 963
Latinbob has a brilliant futureLatinbob has a brilliant future
CamelKarma: 182
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Which Film

We seem to have a consensus on film. I shoot Superia for color print film and Ilford HP4 and FP4 for B&W. I've only done home processing on most of my film work lately, and I based my decision a lot on how easily they process. Ilford is extremely easy to develop at home. The only screw-ups I've had were my own fault!

Bob
Latinbob is online now   Reply With Quote