![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Bactrian
|
What are the basic element rules for hands in a headshot
![]() C&C welcome. ![]() __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
1. Don't cut the hands off if you're going to shoot them at all.
Nice shot here, Don. |
|
__________________
My free desktop wallpaper. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Llama
|
Nice shot Don, I like the look and the hand.
My rule about hands are, no white knuckles and relaxed. But then it's been awhile since i did a head shot. ![]() uumm, soon to be remedied I think, I hope. ![]() |
|
__________________
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of models is a never ending job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Dromedary
|
I'm sorry Amanda, it's just not going to work out. I've found a new girl, I'm moving to Kansas.
Oh. Um. I mean... I think you've got it here, if they're in, they're in, not partway in or out. On that note, do you think this is more of a headshot, or more of an extreme facial (shutup Jimmy)? |
|
__________________
Jon Scott Visual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Dromedary
|
I like this shot, but I need some help to understand the reflection in the eyes from the lights. Is there any rule on how many white reflections should be in the eyes or shape or size?
|
|
__________________
CL Digital Expressions: Chuck Lyman -Photographer. Located in Rockford Illinois. All comments welcome on photos! Using: Olympus E-300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Bactrian
|
very nice shot!!
|
|
__________________
Des photos de femmes pour les femmes. My website: www.lorekphoto.com My email: lorekphoto@hotmail.com Please visit my new site on www.lorekstudio.com I EOS 40D + 24-70mm 2.8 + 70-200mm 2.8 + 100 mm 2.8 macro + 15 mm 2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Bactrian
|
Quote:
Don. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Bactrian
|
Quote:
maybe a bit too far out... Don. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
F1 Camel
|
Speaking strictly about portraits (in other words, not glamour portraits), I think the most important guideline is, 'hands hold & hands rest'. You should always have your subject do something natural with their hands and typically that means holding something... in this case, her chin and cheek. I think it would be appropriate to have her hand touching her face but at rest so the contours of her face aren't altered.
With very close crops like this one, I don't think the all-in or all-out rule works. I have seen beautiful portraits where hands were either partially cropped or positioned in such a way fingers were hidden in shadow or behind hair. In this shot, which is lovely, I think her hand looks too smooth. Hands are full of character and in a portrait, you want that character to come out. Hands tell the viewer something more about the subject. It's not much of a distraction though, I just noticed cuz, uh... you know how I am about hands. ![]() There is something in this shot that distracts me though, the false eyelash on camera right, something just looks wrong with it to me... I can't tell you what it is other than it's out position or coming unstuck or something. It's the first thing I noticed. 'Course, I don't know squat about false eyelashes or makeup either... could be it's supposed to look that way and my eyes are crooked... wouldn't be the first time. :P What I think is awesome about this shot is the subtlety in the shadows around her mouth, eyes and nose. The lighting is very delicate and reveals her contours without digging in and raking up too much texture or throwing any features into deep relief. That was a damn good shoot you had there Don. Chip |
|
__________________
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Dromedary
|
I think that eyelash is just really long, I don't think it's an error on anyone's part.
I think her hand is extra-smooth because (I assume) he used the smoothing filter on the entire image, not just on her face. I have no problem with multiple catchlights; I've never heard of any "one catchlight rule" and I disagree with it. In fact, I think a bunch of smaller catchlights, if positioned interestingly, is kinda neat-o. For some really interesting catchlights, watch the new King Kong movie and pay close attention to the catchlights in the scene in the restaurant where Jack Black is trying to get Naomi Watts (who has NEVER looked better than in that movie, BTW) to join his production. __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
__________________
Jon Scott Visual |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Headshots with a telephoto lens | Uncle Frank | Portraits / People | 3 | 02-09-2007 05:41 PM |
| A shoot from today - Standard headshots and then some. | trentchau | Portraits / People | 7 | 05-08-2006 06:59 AM |
| Plastic Hands | brosig | Macro and Close-up Photography | 0 | 02-22-2006 08:36 AM |
| Helping Hands | dc2 | All Other Styles, Types | 3 | 10-30-2005 11:32 PM |