![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Alpaca
|
How much attention should I pay to the graphics card I get for a new desktop machine if the purpose is primarily photo editing? It seems all the boards today are geared toward gamers -- how many gamers are there out there, anyway? You'd think all people do with computers any more is play games!
So which card should I get? Does it mean when a card is great for games it's great for photoshop, too? __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
Well, no. Really, all you need is a bazillion colors, just to make sure you have more than the color space. A high refresh rate is nice, if the monitor can handle it. I think the cards will be "faster" than the computer running Photoshop on large images, but I could be wrong.
You might want a dual monitor setup some day, so you could think about that. If you might, get a card that has two separate jacks and can handle two monitors that can be set or calibrated individually. I wouldn't get a $29 card, but wouldn't get a $1000 one either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Photocamel Master
|
Something in the 150-250 dollor range should do everyhing you would ever need. And play some games if you want
I have High end gaming cards in both my machines and they work great for Photoshop aswell as dual monitor and games.Hope that helps. Theres so many to choose from; personaly I preffer Radeon over Nividia, but its just personal prefferance. Jay |
|
__________________
Jason Comments and suggestions always appreciated ![]() -Canon: 5D MkII, EF 17-40L, EF 24-105L IS, EF 70-200L f/2.8 IS, EF 50 f/1.8, 580exII Blog JasonHermannPhotography.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Alpaca
|
I would feel pretty comfortable spending $29 on a video card for a photo editing machine if I were to hook it up to a CRT. The only thing missing in general from a cheap card is DVI. What you're usually really paying for in a video card is 3d acceleration. Workstation video cards are geared towards 3d acceleration of CAD and animation type programs.
I've heard ATI generally has better image quality for 2D and movies (may apply more to movies.) The main features to look for are DVI or dual DVI if you plan on connecting 1 or 2 LCD's to it, and of course compatibility with the motherboard (AGP or PCI Express.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
My matrox is actually optimized for 2D.
__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
__________________
¿ <°)))))>< |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The ideal photo-editing computer | JimAuburn | Computers and Software | 6 | 02-15-2007 04:16 AM |
| First Business Card for the photo side of my business | mgerdes | The Business of Photography | 3 | 09-05-2006 10:14 PM |
| Graphics cards help | M. Worthington | Computers and Software | 3 | 08-05-2006 11:43 AM |
| Dual dvi graphics cards | M. Worthington | Computers and Software | 5 | 08-01-2006 08:05 PM |
| Best graphics card | Alice Morrison | Computers and Software | 4 | 09-16-2005 09:26 AM |