![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I'm around sometimes
|
This is a trying time for me. I decided to bite the bullet and try out a 24-105 as I found 70 was just a little too short on my 5d. I'm heart broken though, the 24-70 has been a tank, and old friend of mine. I've only had it a little less then a year, but it's done an amazing job with everything I've thrown at it.
Is there any other camels that have made this step and can give me advice? The 24-70 was on my camera I would say 95% of the time (which makes me wonder why the hell I bought a 70-200 IS also), so I'm hoping the ever 35 will make a difference. Since I shoot more in studio ranging from 5.6~11 I don't think the 2.8 to 4 difference will be too noticable.....but I just need advice. Plus my copy is just so nice! Any one interested, I haven't placed it up yet but I am planning on selling the 24-70 with hood for $975 shipped if things go right. It's a little over a year old now (april 2005 is the build date). __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features. |
|
__________________
Trentchau.com | trent365.com | Latest Blog Post - Introduction to Infrared Photography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Llama
|
Hi, I,ve just got my 24-70L after a long hard decision also. I thought about the 24-105L, but as I am using the 20D and I already have the 70-200 2.8 IS I went for the 24-70. I haven't really had time to evaluate my new lens yet, but I hope I can get the same impressive results that you have. I just need someone to model for me. You have some great pics in your gallery and I am assuming that most of the portraits were taken with the 24-70. What camera were you using prior to the 5D?
Hopefully my next upgrade will be to the 1dMk IIN. With its 1.3 crop factor my 24-70 will still be fine for what I will use it for. Ps. Great gallery website. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Photocamel Master
|
I've thought about replacing my 24-70 for a 24-105 on my 1Ds, but at this point, it's only been a thought.
|
|
__________________
----- If it ain't one thing, it's another. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
I'm around sometimes
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
Trentchau.com | trent365.com | Latest Blog Post - Introduction to Infrared Photography |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Vicuna
|
I came from 20D to 1DMk2 and like the 24-70 f2.8L.
I am the sort that would not mind carrying a few extra lenses and extra bodies but I reckon the 24-105 f4L would give the full frame users a very versatile range. Btw, any direct comparison between 24-70 f2.8L and 24-105 f4L on image quality? Cheers KH Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
From Zero to Hero |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Dromedary
|
Do what I have done, have both!
![]() |
|
__________________
Dwight McCann Live Entertainment Photography: The Way It Was Meant to Be! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
F1 Camel
|
I 'm very happy with my 24-70 f 2.8 you cannot beat that lens
Well i use my 30D with 70-200mm non IS ,and my 24-70 with my Mark IIN I don't think you need a extra lens spent the $$ and get an extra Camera like a nice used 20d You will love it to have both lens at your fingertips at the same time Thanks Emmanuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Vicuna
|
I don't have first hand experience, but reading Fred Miranda reviews I found that most liked their 24-70's and many did not like their 24-105 as well. (Based on overall rating #)
|
|
__________________
All primes all the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Alpaca
|
I am very happy with the 24-105. My copy is extremely sharp with great color! No knocks on the 24-70 just compliments on the 24-105.
|
|
__________________
1D MK3,5DMK2, 5D Zeiss 100 F/2 Makro ZE, Zeiss 21/2.8 Distagon T*ZE:24-70 2.8L:24-105L,35L:85 1.2L:70-200 F/2.8L ISII:100-400L: 15 2.8 Fisheye: Sigma 150 2.8 Macro (FOR SALE). 580 EX,430EX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Vicuna
|
I absolutely love my 24-70L. It's imagery is great although it is a pretty heavy chunk!
It has made me rethink my primary battery of lenses. I had the 17-40 f/4L, 28-135 IS and the 70-200 f/4L. That was a pretty nice setup with the 17-40L giving me 11mm wider than the 28-135 IS. However, after purchasing the 24-70L (I got a great deal on a minty one from a pro who was converting to the 24-105mm F/4L IS lens) the 17-40L just didn't seem wide enough. It was only 7mm wider than the 24-70L. Hardly enough to keep an expensive lens like that for. I have replaced it with the 12-24mm f/4 Tokina. I absolutely love that lens and it makes a great partner with the 24-70L. My old friend the 17-40L will soon go the Ebay route. Nice thing about L lenses is that if you buy one used, you will always get your money back when selling it. __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features. |
|
__________________
I'm a retired Navy Photographer with considerable commercial experience including weddings, portraits and pet photography. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Share this topic: |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Losing My Soul | johnw | Photo Illustration & Digital Art | 5 | 01-09-2007 12:06 PM |
| HELP! I'm losing all my photos | Catman | Computers and Software | 5 | 10-22-2005 05:56 PM |
| Is Nikon losing it? | Vincent Sleep | Nikon Forum | 15 | 09-16-2005 11:19 AM |