PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
Photography Contest Photo of the Week Photo of the Week

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photography Forum > Cameras and Lenses > Canon Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-01-2005   #1
Alpaca
 
Posts: 44
Chris is on a distinguished road
CamelKarma: 12
Default 100 Macro as non-Macro

Being a poor college student I am looking at using some hard-earned birthday cash toward a new lens, and I'm considering either the 85 1.8 or 100 2.8 Macro. I'd really like to get the Macro, but my question is how versatile would it be? I'm wondering how able is in in everyday shooting, such as a portraits lens, or possibly even sports photography on campus here? I'm thinking basketball, is the AF on it decent for moving targets and such? I know the 85 excells at both, but I'd love to have a true macro lens if I could.

ChRis


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2005   #2
PhotoCamel Supporter DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
ohenry's Avatar
 
Location: Medford OR
Posts: 8,834
ohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud ofohenry has much to be proud of
CamelKarma: 10255
Editing OK?: No
Default Re: 100 Macro as non-Macro

The 100mm f/2.8 macro performs well as a normal lens. It is sharp and the USM is fast and quiet. I don't think 100mm is a good focal length for sports photography, however. It will work, but your subjects will need to be close.
__________________
-----
If it ain't one thing, it's another.
ohenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2005   #3
Bactrian
 
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 2,314
Kevin Barrett is just really niceKevin Barrett is just really niceKevin Barrett is just really niceKevin Barrett is just really niceKevin Barrett is just really nice
CamelKarma: 435
Default Re: 100 Macro as non-Macro

The 100 Macro is a very flexible lens and totally up for portrait duty. Awesome bokeh etc.
However, I think the 85 f1.8 is a faster focusing lens and more suited to fast action.

The 100 is really nice, but it has a much wider focus range to cover. The distance switch
helps to improve the speed, but I still think the 85 f/1.8 would be better in a sports application.

I suppose you'll have to decide whether you like macros or sports shooting better...
__________________
KB

The influence of a well-balanced, well-ordered life is of inestimable value. . . . E.G. White
Kevin Barrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2005   #4
F1 Camel
 
Narsuitus's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,527
Narsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to beholdNarsuitus is a splendid one to behold
CamelKarma: 4044
Default Re: 100 Macro as non-Macro

Since both focal lengths can be used for portraits and since both lenses can be used for sports (at least the sports where you are close to the action such as courtside basketball and ringside boxing), it really depends on what you need more—the macro feature of the 100mm or the light gathering speed of the 85mm.
Narsuitus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005   #5
Vicuna
 
Posts: 213
rpcrowe is on a distinguished road
CamelKarma: 31
Default More than just getting by....

I have purchased a Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP AF Macro lens (not the DI model) for less than $225 on Ebay (including postage). It has turned out to be an excellent macro and general purpose lens and competes very well with the Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro. In fact in some categories, the Tamron surpasses the Canon... although in most categories, they are a dead heat.

http://www.photo.net/equipment/canon/can-tam-macro/

The purchase price wasn't a fluke. These Tamron lenses usually sell in the neighborhood of $200-225 Used.

The lens has beautiful bokeh and has been called the "Macro Portrait Lens". It is easy and fun to use and the images appear to be extremelt sharp and crisp.

I am still getting acquainted with all the facets of this lens. It has been many years since I owned a dedicated macro lens. I have seen some absolutely wonderful macro images shot with this lens.

The reason I posted this is to let you know that there are other viable options than the Canon 100mm macro.
__________________
I'm a retired Navy Photographer with considerable commercial experience including weddings, portraits and pet photography.
rpcrowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2005   #6
Bactrian
 
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 2,314
Kevin Barrett is just really niceKevin Barrett is just really niceKevin Barrett is just really niceKevin Barrett is just really niceKevin Barrett is just really nice
CamelKarma: 435
Default Re: 100 Macro as non-Macro

Quote:
Originally Posted by rpcrowe
I have purchased a Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP AF Macro lens (not the DI model) for less than $225 on Ebay (including postage). It has turned out to be an excellent macro and general purpose lens and competes very well with the Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro. In fact in some categories, the Tamron surpasses the Canon... although in most categories, they are a dead heat.

http://www.photo.net/equipment/canon/can-tam-macro/

The purchase price wasn't a fluke. These Tamron lenses usually sell in the neighborhood of $200-225 Used.

The lens has beautiful bokeh and has been called the "Macro Portrait Lens". It is easy and fun to use and the images appear to be extremelt sharp and crisp.

I am still getting acquainted with all the facets of this lens. It has been many years since I owned a dedicated macro lens. I have seen some absolutely wonderful macro images shot with this lens.

The reason I posted this is to let you know that there are other viable options than the Canon 100mm macro.
Congrats on your purchase. It sounds like you've got a great copy. Post some results!
__________________
KB

The influence of a well-balanced, well-ordered life is of inestimable value. . . . E.G. White
Kevin Barrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2005   #7
PhotoCamel Supporter DONATED
Camel Breath
 
JDArt's Avatar
 
Location: Far out, man
Posts: 22,893
JDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 248164
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: 100 Macro as non-Macro

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Being a poor college student I am looking at using some hard-earned birthday cash toward a new lens, and I'm considering either the 85 1.8 or 100 2.8 Macro. I'd really like to get the Macro, but my question is how versatile would it be?
Chris, you'll ultimately want both of these lenses, I think. I know I consider both indispensible, but if I were to have to choose one, it would be the 85 1.8, simply because it's smaller and as a walkaround lens, it's better, since it's easier to handhold without inducing camera shake. The 100mm macro is too long on 1.6x cameras, I think, for handholding.

The 1.8 *does not* focus close, however. That's a downside. They're really not interchangable at all.


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member of PhotoCamel to open up the site's many benefits and features.
JDArt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photography Forum > Cameras and Lenses > Canon Forum »


Share this topic:

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
18-180 , 18-125 , 14-45 , 40-150, 50 macro , 25 ex fotobram Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds Forum 7 01-03-2008 01:18 PM
Macro fotobram Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds Forum 20 01-24-2007 01:20 PM
Macro Here ..... alishokri Macro and Close-up Photography 5 09-03-2006 11:24 AM
First real macro with my macro fotobram Macro and Close-up Photography 8 04-21-2006 10:39 AM
Various macro`s Raym Macro and Close-up Photography 20 01-17-2006 10:38 PM