![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Bactrian
|
As I'm mostly taking landscapes, I'm used to using wide angle lenses (Sigma 10-20mm on 350D usually at the short end). On the 5D I currently use (hypothetically since the weather is really rubbish so far this summer) the EF 24-105mm. But it's not wide enough for me, so I'm in search of a proper wide angle lens. The Canon EF16-35mm f2.8L USM II looks great, but it's way too expensive (over £1K) and I certainly don't need the f/2.8 for landscapes (where I use mostly the f/11-f/22 range). So I've been looking around and found a few candidates, all having their up and down sides. What would be your choice and why? Any other suggestions?
- Sigma 12-24mm F4-5.6 EX DG: insanely wide on full-frame sensor that makes it really attractive. But the protruding lens makes is impossible to use any filter other than gelatin filters. Distortions are pronounced, but that's to be expected. - Sigma 15-30mm F3.5-4.5 EX DG: fairly wide and cheap. But again protruding lens makes it impossible to use filters. Distortions are pronounced and image quality isn't great. - Sigma 17-35mm f2.8 EX DG HSM: I don't have any information or test data about this lens. - Canon EF 17-40mm f4 LUSM: pretty good lens all round, with normal distortions at the wide end but good picture quality. The downside is that it's not that wide (although nearly equivalent to the Sigma 10-20mm on a cropped body I'm used to, so acceptable). I'm disappointed I couldn't find non fish-eye prime lenses at around 12 to 16mm for FF bodies. __________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
__________________
My very amateurish gallery: http://www.raguenaud-online.org/cedric/gallery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Bactrian
|
17mm on a full frame is plenty wide. You can deal with some pretty scary linear distortion at 15+.
The Sigma 15-30 is noisy, it needs HSM. Here is a picture taken with a 17-40, but I think it might not be full 17 ![]() |
|
__________________
[5DMarkII/5DMarkII/7D] [35 1.4L][50 1.2L][85 1.2L II] [100 2.8L IS Macro] [16-35 2.8L] [24-70 2.8L] [70-200 2.8L IS ] [580 EX II/580EX II] [Norman ML600R Mono blocs(X6)] [Sekonic L758DR] [Canon CPS Pro Member]
http://www.trentchau.com | www.flickr.com/photos/trentchau |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
Cedric,
I have the 12-24 from Sigma. It is a great lens. |
|
__________________
Rense [5D][50D][20D][G10][EFS 10-22][Sigma 12-24][Sigma 15][EF 17-40][TSE 24][Sigma 30][EF 50;f/1.4][EF 50;f/1.8][EF 24-105][Tamron 28-75][MP-E65][EF 70-200 f/4][EF 70-300DO][EF 85 f/1.8][EF 100 Macro][Sigma 105][EF 135 f/2.8SF][Tamron 180mm macro][Bigma][Tamron TC1.4x][580EX][420EX (2x)][M24EX][STE-2][DigiFlash][VariosixF2+Spot][a whole bunch of M42 lenses][CPS Europe member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Bactrian
|
Ok, so the comments narrow it down to the Canon 17-40 or the Sigma 12-24. The really big issue I have against the Sigma is the fact that I can't add a filter. I can possibly live (with difficulty) without ND grads, but I can't see how I could live without polarisers
![]() |
|
__________________
My very amateurish gallery: http://www.raguenaud-online.org/cedric/gallery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Bactrian
|
Rense, did you use the Sigma on the 5D? How are the vignetting and the sharpness?
|
|
__________________
My very amateurish gallery: http://www.raguenaud-online.org/cedric/gallery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Photocamel Master
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ...or Canon EF15mmF2.8fisheye USM, de-fished... €625 pricerange... ...from what I know, *I* would go for the 17-40F4L, several serious testers have reported this lens to be sharper corner-to-corner than the 16-35L II... ...& perhaps this might help a little ? ...€0.02... Kindest regards! Max@Home |
|
|
__________________
[All Canon] [EF16-35L II] [EF24-70L] [EF24-105L IS] [EF28-300L IS] [EF70-200F2.8L IS] [EF100-400L IS] [EF50F1.4] [EF85F1.2L II] [EF135F2.0L] [EF 1.4x II] [270ex] [430ex II] [580ex II] [ST-E2] [CP-E4] [EOS-1D Mk III] [EOS 5D MkII with BG-E6] [CPS Europe member] ...PBase images ?? ...or: SmugMug images ?? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Photocamel Master
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,171
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Gallery
|
Blog
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
-Michael |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Dromedary
|
The 12-24 is too wide for a polarizer, anyway. At that extreme just a small portion of the sky will be affected by the polarizer and the sky will show banding.
You might be able to get away with a large square graduated ND filter hand-held against the built-in lens hood. I actually have not tried my 12-24 with my 5D. I should go do that some day soon. Right now I'm hooked on the Canon 15mm fisheye. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Vicuna
|
Cedric i have a 17-35 L lens F2.8 for sale if you are interested or if you have a macro lens we could do a swap i believe you are in aberdeen i am based just south of you in between aberdeen and forfar let me know if you are interested
btw it takes 77mm screw on filters of which i tend to use either hoya and b & w. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Camel Breath
|
cedric,
vignetting is not that much of a problem (when you donot forget to remove the petal lenshood). Sharpness is good from f/8 onward. |
|
__________________
Rense [5D][50D][20D][G10][EFS 10-22][Sigma 12-24][Sigma 15][EF 17-40][TSE 24][Sigma 30][EF 50;f/1.4][EF 50;f/1.8][EF 24-105][Tamron 28-75][MP-E65][EF 70-200 f/4][EF 70-300DO][EF 85 f/1.8][EF 100 Macro][Sigma 105][EF 135 f/2.8SF][Tamron 180mm macro][Bigma][Tamron TC1.4x][580EX][420EX (2x)][M24EX][STE-2][DigiFlash][VariosixF2+Spot][a whole bunch of M42 lenses][CPS Europe member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Photocamel Muse
|
The 17-40L is next on my lens list.
![]() |
|
__________________
Look back without regret, forward without fear and around you with wonder. -aw carey My Old View Macro Challenge #26 - GLASS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Dromedary
|
I've got a bunch of 15mm/5D images on Flickr at http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=fish...16343927%40N00
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Photocamel Muse
|
|
|
__________________
Look back without regret, forward without fear and around you with wonder. -aw carey My Old View Macro Challenge #26 - GLASS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Photocamel Master
|
I know Athena, and what a hefty purchase that was. You are after a monitor too, am I right (I just got mine, Dell 24).
__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wide angle lens for portraits? | Uncle Frank | Portraits / People | 10 | 05-30-2007 12:01 AM |
| Just because I like wide angle | cedric_r | Street / Urban / Performance / Photojournalism | 2 | 04-16-2007 02:44 PM |
| Any recs for a wide angle lens? | rommelvon | Nikon Forum | 13 | 03-06-2007 07:13 AM |
| Wide angle lens choices | JDArt | Photography Talk | 19 | 02-01-2006 05:15 PM |
| Extreme wide angle lens shots | AlbertP | Photography Talk | 14 | 12-23-2005 04:52 PM |