PhotoCamel: Your friendly photo community, with free discussion forums, digital photography reviews, photo sharing, galleries, downloads, blogs, photography contests, and prizes.
Photo of the Week Photo of the Week

Go Back   PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum > The Photographer > Camera Accessories Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #1 (permalink)
Alpaca
 
Posts: 20
wsolum will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 10
Default Did the Cactus v4 Cause this banding?

I did a senior shoot Monday and the images from the first portion turned out fine but the second portion where I used a Cactus v4 on my Canon 5D had terrible banding across the upper third of the images.

A few tests back at the studio show now problem with the images with or without the cactus.

If it wasn't the cactus, what could have caused this? If it was, then why does it seem intermittent?

I have never experienced this problem before.

Thanks,
Wayne


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg wspSophie_20091019_254.jpg (53.3 KB, 69 views)
wsolum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #2 (permalink)
Vicuna
 
mickeyfdr's Avatar
 
Location: alexandria,TN
Posts: 147
mickeyfdr has a reputation beyond reputemickeyfdr has a reputation beyond reputemickeyfdr has a reputation beyond reputemickeyfdr has a reputation beyond reputemickeyfdr has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 413
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Did the Cactus v4 Cause this banding?

I dont see the banding the image looks black to me. Was it you sync speed too fast?
__________________
Mickey
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyfdr/
mickeyfdr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #3 (permalink)
Alpaca
 
Posts: 20
wsolum will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 10
Default Re: Did the Cactus v4 Cause this banding?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeyfdr View Post
I dont see the banding the image looks black to me. Was it you sync speed too fast?
It is a bit dark but not black. Here's a different shot with exposure bumped up to emphasize. Shutter speed was 1/30
wsolum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #4 (permalink)
Alpaca
 
Posts: 20
wsolum will become famous soon enough
CamelKarma: 10
Default Re: Did the Cactus v4 Cause this banding?

Okay - here's the image . . . (I think).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg wspSophie_20091019_302.jpg (104.8 KB, 54 views)
wsolum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #5 (permalink)
Llama
 
Posts: 534
EOS_JD has a reputation beyond reputeEOS_JD has a reputation beyond reputeEOS_JD has a reputation beyond reputeEOS_JD has a reputation beyond reputeEOS_JD has a reputation beyond reputeEOS_JD has a reputation beyond reputeEOS_JD has a reputation beyond repute
CamelKarma: 701
Default Re: Did the Cactus v4 Cause this banding?

CF card problem? Cactus might show a dark black banding if it can't keep up with the sync speed but I don't think that has anything to do with ths!

If not the flash card - well it may be a camera problem
__________________
EOS 40D with grip| EOS 20D with Grip | EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5 | EF 24-105 f4L IS | EF 70-200 f2.8L IS | EF 50 f/1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 100 f2.8 Macro | EF 300 f4L IS | EF 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4 | 28-75 f2.8 | Canon 580EX | Sigma EF500 DG Super | Lightsphere II | Stofen Diffuser | Epson P-2000 |Manfroto 055 ProB Tripod w/488RC4 Head | Epson R2400 | Epson C900 | Lowepro Nova 5 AW | Lowepro Mini Trekker AW | Elinchrom 400BX x3 strobes | Sekonic L-358 | Various studio accessories
EOS_JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #6 (permalink)
F1 Camel
 
Location: Jax FL
Posts: 3,629
badpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1200
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Did the Cactus v4 Cause this banding?

looks a bit like rfi, but rfi would usually affect the whole picture


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
Fuji S2/S3/S5 Pro
Kenko MC7 2X, Pro 300
Nkkor 50 1.8 70-300VR
Phoenix 100, 650-1300& Sima 100mm F2 SF
Sigma 12-24, 18-50 HSM, 18-125, 50-500, 70-300, 120-300, 1.4X 2x
Tamron 28-75
badpickev is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum > The Photographer > Camera Accessories Forum »


Bookmarks

Tags
banding, cactus, trigger
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cactus V4 t-shot Lighting and Technique 10 04-28-2009 07:31 AM
Capture one v4.0 beta is out Rense Image Editing and Color Management 2 09-07-2007 07:07 AM
IDimager v4 public beta jgodfrey Your Work on the Web / Announcements / Camel Group Announcements 0 06-05-2007 02:12 PM
DxO Optics Pro V4 anyone? sagar Image Editing and Color Management 2 01-03-2007 11:05 AM
Elements V3 or V4 paulanne1 Image Editing and Color Management 1 11-02-2005 10:32 PM