![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Vicuna
|
Howdy, I wanted to ask if there is a differerence in filters for digital and film cameras? I would think that there wouldn't be, but nowadays you can't tell anymore.
Thanks, Ed __________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
F1 Camel
|
Any differences in the glass exist only in the minds of the marketing world.
There are filters that you'd use for film that are not necessary for digital, however. |
|
__________________
'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have. - Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Vicuna
|
Reason I'm asking is, I found some filters that said digital camera filter on the package. I was wanting to use them on my film cameras, but if there is a difference then I'll save my money. They're a circular polarizer and UV filter packaged together.
Ed |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Dromedary
|
The difference is in polarizer filters. Linear polorizers are designed for film and circular for digital. I understand that unacceptable results come from using linear polarizers on digital cameras. I do not know that the same holds true for circular polarizers being used on digitals. Every other kind of filter should work as well for one as the other. Color, Nuetral Density, UV, Skylighter, Haze, Star point ought to behave with a digital camera as expected to with a film camera.
|
|
__________________
Have you ever stopped to think and forgot to start again? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
F1 Camel
Location: Saratoga, California, USA
Posts: 4,455
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
CamelKarma: 486
Editing OK?: Ask first
Gallery
|
Blog
|
Quote:
Theoretically you could shoot with a linear polarizer on an AF/AE camera, but you'd be giving up accurate AF and AE, which defeats the purpose of having those features in the first place. |
|
|
__________________
-Michael |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Vicuna
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
F1 Camel
|
As I said earlier, it's simply a marketing ploy.
One of my favorite marketing ploys was the "Internet Ready" computer desk. __________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more. |
|
__________________
'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have. - Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| « » |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Enhancing Filters: any use? | Bunyip | Camera Accessories Forum | 17 | 05-24-2008 02:53 PM |
| ND Filters | diver46 | Camera Accessories Forum | 10 | 11-13-2007 04:04 PM |
| screw on filters vs. cokin filters | on388 | Nikon Forum | 18 | 10-30-2007 06:01 PM |
| Filters | .exz0r | Camera Accessories Forum | 33 | 02-14-2007 10:03 PM |
| What filters do you use the most? | Paul Shields | Image Editing and Color Management | 6 | 08-17-2006 12:08 PM |