Thread: 1D Mark III?
View Single Post
Old 08-09-2006   #2 (permalink)
cyclohexane
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,171
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: 1D Mark III?
Merging the two lines would be bad for those who need to replace cameras often- the target market of the high speed lines. Newspapers are not going to want to buy $8000 megapixel monsters every time they need a new body.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is offline   Reply With Quote