View Single Post
Old 07-27-2006   #2 (permalink)
cyclohexane
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,171
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Nikon 24-120VR and 18-200VR for general wildlife/nature

Just about every single Japanese traveler with a Nikon DSLR I saw in Hokkaido had the 18-200 mounted. I think that's a testimony to the quality. While Japanese tend to love to be part of a trend, I doubt they're all using the 18-200 because "everyone else is". It's earned top marks from the CAPA "Super Book" series; Thom Hogan also rates the 18-200 quite highly. Most people do not rate the 24-120 very highly, though Moose Peterson has been on record to say that, in general, he liked the lens. Personally, I'd pick the 18-200 if I was buying one of the two, as it gives you more range at both ends.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote