View Single Post
Old 06-22-2009   #6 (permalink)
badpickev
F1 Camel
 
Location: Jax FL
Posts: 3,629
badpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbadpickev strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1200
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: 70-300 ED vs 70-300 ED VR

from my usage and testing. optically speaking from best to worst

70-300 VR
70-300 ED
70-300 APO - sigma
70-300 dl - sigma
70-300 - tamron
70-300 G
70-300 tokina

anything not listed here is usually worse than the ones listed the last four are all pretty close to each other to really not matter much. they all are what one would call kit lenses

so i always tell people if you can afford the vr get it.
the sigma apo is really close to the nikon ed, but i have seen just enough of a edge to place the ed about it.
__________________
Fuji S2/S3/S5 Pro
Kenko MC7 2X, Pro 300
Nkkor 50 1.8 70-300VR
Phoenix 100, 650-1300& Sima 100mm F2 SF
Sigma 12-24, 18-50 HSM, 18-125, 50-500, 70-300, 120-300, 1.4X 2x
Tamron 28-75
badpickev is offline   Reply With Quote