Thread: BING
View Single Post
Old 06-09-2009   #5 (permalink)
felix.reichardt
Photocamel Master
 
Posts: 5,025
felix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorfelix.reichardt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 11792
Editing OK?: No
Default Re: BING

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stercus Vultus View Post
So? How did you fare? Publicity isn't very favorable sofar: Bing: What’s in a Name? (Updated) | Epicenter | Wired.com
Well, mixed feelings: I want a comptetition to google as they are getting too mighty But it seems it still a long way for MS (or others).

The pure search is somewhat ok and I could live here without google. Hard to say what gives better results since there is no authority to tell you google is right or MS. I use google news a lot.

The news search on google is WAY better. Its a little like a portal and gives me an overview of whats going on. This also includes some pics so it feels more like a virtual newspaper.

I think the presentation layer stinks: They spend so much money for that? I like the way google presents results just better. I don't need a background with a mountain or whatever.

So far google wins hands down (unfortunately) IMHO.
felix.reichardt is offline   Reply With Quote