View Single Post
Old 05-09-2006   #5 (permalink)
Max@Home
Photocamel Master
 
Max@Home's Avatar
 
Location: Castricum, The Netherlands
Posts: 6,286
Max@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorMax@Home strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 6171
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Canon lenses vs Sigma lenses

Hi Lorek,

What does EX, DG, IF and HSM stand for?

EX = Exclusiv, HighQuality, like 'L' (luxury) with Canon

DG = Digital Grade, coatings optimized for digital camera's. Note DG is still FullFrame! The EF-S equivalent of SIGMA is called DC.

IF = Innen-focussierung, internal focussing, so no turning outer lens elements (usefull if you use polarizing filters)

HSM = HyperSonicMotor, silent focussing, SIGMA's USM equivalent

(source: http://www.sigma-foto.de/cms/front_c...ent=1&idcat=15,
or http://www.sigma-photo.com/lenses/lenses.asp if you prefer English )

If you can miss/spare the extra 4mm on the wide end, IMHO the Tamron 28-75 is a better lens than the Sigma 24-70.

The main difference between the Sigma 70-200 and the Canon 70-200 NON-IS is the buildquality (and colour rendition )

I shot and compared the Sigma and the NON-IS 70-200 Canon, on my -then- 10D you could easily see the SIGMA had a slightly warmer tone compared to the Canon (a reddish/yellowish 'cast', not annoying, just different ).

In the end, I opted for the Canon 70-200 IS, as IMHO IS is a very very usefull extra, giving the lens more versatility.

The 70-200 IS is my second most used lens, the (Canon) 24-70 is my most used 'workhorse' (- at the moment - ).

Main difference between the Canon and SIGMA 24-70: again build quality and colourcast: in the case of the 24-70's I tested, the colour difference was a bit less pronounced than on the 70-200's I shot, but the difference in build quality was more evident between the 24-70's.

Hope this helps some, *my* €0.02 worth...

Kindest regards,

Max@Home
__________________

[All
Canon] [EF16-35L II] [EF24-70L] [EF24-105L IS] [EF28-300L IS] [EF70-200F2.8L IS] [EF100-400L IS] [EF50F1.4] [EF85F1.2L II] [EF135F2.0L] [EF 1.4x II] [270ex] [430ex II] [580ex II] [ST-E2] [CP-E4] [EOS-1D Mk III] [EOS 5D MkII with BG-E6] [CPS Europe member]

...PBase images ?? ...or: SmugMug images ??
Max@Home is online now   Reply With Quote