View Single Post
Old 08-23-2008   #6 (permalink)
brian.austin
Photocamel Master
 
brian.austin's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 7,085
brian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorbrian.austin strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 4737
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Model VS photographer in ownership of legal rights/copy-rights

Quote:
Originally Posted by photocycle View Post
Interesting responses...
Here are the responses I got from DPREVIEW.... I think it's good that all photographers know the exact answer to this...
Very few of us care about what DPR regulars think. Different culture.

No, all photographers should know better than getting themselves into the situation in the first place.

Model + photograph = release.

No exceptions if you're doing anything more than taking family/friend snapshots. Most portrait and wedding contracts have releases in them as well (mine do for self-promotion/non-commercial use).
__________________
Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas
brian.austin is offline   Reply With Quote