Thread: D200 vs. 30D - A Review
View Single Post
Old 04-04-2006   #7 (permalink)
Nikonfreak
F1 Camel
 
Nikonfreak's Avatar
 
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,134
Nikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1178
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: D200 vs. 30D - A Review
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidRM
I guess pushing the ISO is cheaper than buying fast glass

-David
Can't get much faster at 200mm than the Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8... well... the 200mm f/2.0 NIkkor VR, but that's about $5,000 USD.

I think those 1,000,000 candle power spot lights are on sale at Bass Pro Shops for about $29

Take those ISO worries right out of the picture. LOL

Julio
__________________
I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of 'taking care' of them. - Thomas Jefferson
Nikonfreak is offline   Reply With Quote