Thread: D200 vs. 30D - A Review
View Single Post
Old 04-04-2006   #5 (permalink)
Nikonfreak
F1 Camel
 
Nikonfreak's Avatar
 
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,134
Nikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1178
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: D200 vs. 30D - A Review
Here's a shot at ISO 1250 with the D200.

No noise reduction in camera or otherwise, size reduced for presentation here.

Darn good if you ask me. I'm impressed by the D200's ISO performance, but I rarely even at concert shoots go over 800 ISO and on the D100, I'd try to avoid going over 640 ISO...

Julio
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_3280 smallcopy.jpg (67.9 KB, 174 views)
__________________
I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of 'taking care' of them. - Thomas Jefferson
Nikonfreak is offline   Reply With Quote