PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community - View Single Post

roncgizmo · 06-18-2008

Yeah, I noticed the ISO started at 200 I think it was.. Even my PS starts at 80. As far as the CCD vs CMOS thing go's (from what I was reading) it don't sound like it makes that much of a difference on the lower end cameras re: price point it takes a lot of effort to make a CMOS work better then a CCD =time and money and the bottom line however the CCD and CMOS seem to be a close match from the start with both having good as well as bad attributes. both nikon and canon are great
cameras IMO and both have a lot available I think for me it's just going to be the value of the two at this point.. Do I sound confused yet? lol

06-18-2008	#21 (permalink)
roncgizmo Vicuna Location: New Jersey Posts: 248 CamelKarma: 148 Editing OK?: Yes Gallery \| Blog	Re: 10D vs 300/350D? Yeah, I noticed the ISO started at 200 I think it was.. Even my PS starts at 80. As far as the CCD vs CMOS thing go's (from what I was reading) it don't sound like it makes that much of a difference on the lower end cameras re: price point it takes a lot of effort to make a CMOS work better then a CCD =time and money and the bottom line however the CCD and CMOS seem to be a close match from the start with both having good as well as bad attributes. both nikon and canon are great cameras IMO and both have a lot available I think for me it's just going to be the value of the two at this point.. Do I sound confused yet? lol __________________ __________________ Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.