Thread: nikon 70-200 2.8 vr
View Single Post
Old 06-16-2008   #5 (permalink)
RvA944
Guanaco
 
RvA944's Avatar
 
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 382
RvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorRvA944 strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1446
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default 70-200 f/2.8 VR vrs. 80-200 f/2.8
Hello All,

Not trying to highjack the thread but how much difference is there between the 70-200f/2.8 VR & 80-200f/2.8 I was just about to pull the trigger and order the 80-200 when I saw this thread and I figured I better ask first? Is the VR really needed? I want it for a portrait/indoor sports lens.

Best,
Roger
RvA944 is offline   Reply With Quote