Thread: No sign of the 70-300 AF-S VR
View Single Post
Old 02-27-2006   #2 (permalink)
cyclohexane
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,171
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: No sign of the 70-300 AF-S VR
I'm hoping it's real, as 70-300 is a very useful travel range, currently occupied by two lenses that could be much, much better.* The optics had better be improved, though, or else I'd just skip it.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote