Despite the demise of a few great films, the future of LF looks good. LF film is an economical path to top quality digital printing. One can start with an older second-hand LF camera and lens and a good flatbed scanner with LF transparancy adaptor. Careful shopping would keep the cost below that of entry level DSLRs. The soon to be released
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1929360,00.asp and a newer LF outfit has potential far beyond that of MF and smaller cameras, and perhaps at a lower cost.
Of course there is the conventional darkroom. LF enlargers are now a bargain. Older LF cameras and lenses need not be expensive. Quality prints are easy to produce, even with ancient equipment. The versatility of a view camera is unmatched by economical DSLR outfits. LF has advantages when using alternative processes.
LF gear does have disadvantages. For snapshots, wildlife, and sports a DSLR is clearly better. LF requires more thought and physical energy. I often use 35mm film for convenience. I even use a cheap digital camera for a few purposes. For versatility and quality, i much prefer LF.