View Single Post
Old 02-01-2008   #2 (permalink)
Paul Shields
senses working overtime
 
Paul Shields's Avatar
 
Location: right here, right now
Posts: 10,929
Paul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1436
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Olympus E-3 owners- experience so far?

This reminds me - must add the E-3 to the reviews database .

My take on it - coming from an E-1 I was initially a little disappointed by a few of the compromises when I first picked it up. Just little things like the quality of the dials, the latches and the battery door. I'd still take the E-3 over something like a 5D in terms of build quality, but it's not quite got that 100% pro feel to it that you get with the E-1.

However, Olympus have updated it where it matters. Excellent big bright 100% viewfinder. Useful swivel LCD (I can't see how Live View can be as useful if it's static). Very fast handling compared to the E-1 - though that's just a natural progression due to a few years development in processing. The much more adaptable AF on the E-3 seems like it's a cause of confusion or upset for some, but I've not really had problems with it since the first day when I had it configured incorrectly for the type of shooting I was doing. There is still a lot for me to learn with this AF - almost makes me yearn for the simple 3 point AF of the E-1 . Also with regards to AF - all of my lenses focus faster on the E-3 than on the E-1. Quite noticable, and when using an SWD lens it's as fast as I've experienced with any lens. Let's just hope it doesn't give up accuracy for speed .

RAW files are definitely a stop or two better in noise compared to my E-1 or E-400. I don't like the JPEG processing so much on the E-3 - I need -2 sharpening and -2 contrast to get anywhere near a natural image. The ISO switch I find a bit fiddly to access, but! Now we have auto-ISO with selectable range - as I'm more than happy with ISO up to 800 on the E-3 I just leave it in auto-ISO mode. Higher ISO is usable too, but only when really required.

All in all - a definite improvement over my E-1 in the areas of picture quality and speed. I'd still happily use the E-1 though as it really is the most joyful camera to use and hold. But - we can't stop the march of technology can we.

[edit]
I must admit I wrote my 'review' after only skimming yours Raist. Now I've read yours in detail I find it an interesting take on the E-3, and nicely contrasting to mine. You seem a bit disappointed how fiddly it is to change settings, and I've not really mentioned it. I guess that just shows how people will always react differently depending on where they're coming from. I'm a pretty slow and methodical photographer so don't mind fumbling around a bit to get the settings I want. I can imagine that if you need to set something up very quickly or you'll miss your shot then your points are well made.
Paul Shields is online now   Reply With Quote