Thread: 70-200mm lens
View Single Post
Old 12-18-2007   #12 (permalink)
cyclohexane
F1 Camel
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: Westwood
Posts: 4,744
cyclohexane is just really very very nicecyclohexane is just really very very nicecyclohexane is just really very very nicecyclohexane is just really very very nicecyclohexane is just really very very nicecyclohexane is just really very very nicecyclohexane is just really very very nice
CamelKarma: 838
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: 70-200mm lens

Quote:
How does anyone feel about the 80-200 F2.8 option? It's considerably cheaper although it doesn't have VR.
The AF/D version still available new isn't nearly as sharp wide open, but should be comparable stopped down to, say, f/5.6. Focusing is slower but still workable on most cameras (screw drive motor), no instant override for focusing, and the plastic "M-A" ring for enabling/disabling AF likes to break. Not a bad option, but there's a reason it's cheaper. Also, the bokeh is different.

The 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-S, on the other hand, is also fairly sharp wide open and fast focusing, with instant override. Optically not as good as the 70-200mm, but a competitive option. Unfortunately, this lens is discontinued and only available used.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is offline   Reply With Quote