Thread: Epson 3800 - cheaper in the long run?
View Single Post
Old 10-30-2007   #6 (permalink)
JDArt
Camel Breath
 
JDArt's Avatar
 
Location: Far out, man
Posts: 13,163
JDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorJDArt strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1170
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Re: Epson 3800 - cheaper in the long run?
Very interesting thread. I hadn't heard of the 3800 before. Any way to cut down on ink costs would be welcome. Here's a link to the Epson site touting the 3800.

Ah, but these reviews don't sound good.

I've had several Epson printers in the past, and have always been disappointed ultimately: metamarism, high ink usage, slow printing. Canon printers have given me far less trouble.
JDArt is online now   Reply With Quote