Thread: Epson 3800 - cheaper in the long run?
View Single Post
Old 10-27-2007   #1 (permalink)
Paul Shields
senses working overtime
 
Paul Shields's Avatar
 
Location: right here, right now
Posts: 10,913
Paul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorPaul Shields strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1436
Editing OK?: Yes
Default Epson 3800 - cheaper in the long run?
From what I can gather this printer is one of the cheaper printers as far as running costs go due to the larger ink cartridges (720ml).

As I'm currently trying to determine which large(ish) format printer to go for, would this printer make sense for making majority A3 (11.7 x 16.5 in) and the occasional A2 (16.5 x 23.4 in) prints rather than opting for a purely A3 printer (Canon 9500, HP B9108 etc)?

__________________
__________________
Members don't see this ad. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
Paul Shields is offline   Reply With Quote