View Single Post
Old 10-07-2007   #39 (permalink)
cyclohexane
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,171
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

Quote:
But to my eyes, and judging from pre-prod bodies, the difference is noticeable.
Just a suggestion... check to see if the difference is apparent to your viewers' eyes. As photographers we tend to notice noise, film grain, and other imperfections to a greater degree than others.

Quote:
On the other hand, I "output" mainly for web and on-screen displays. Are you usually printing?
How large are the images you display on the web? When you downsize for web the noise usually disappears to the point where you see very little of it, though if you're putting 1280x1024 images on the web you'll still see some noise. On-screen display is a different beast though, as the resolution and image sizes are usually well within the realm that allows noise to be apparent.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is offline   Reply With Quote