View Single Post
Old 10-05-2007   #8 (permalink)
cyclohexane
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,171
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Not sure about the D300

The samples look okay to me, especially at 6400. Also, the images look at least 1/3-stop underexposed. Like everyone said, we're looking at internet samples.

How large are you printing?

Quote:
I save a couple hundred bucks, and loose nothing more than 2 Mpixels and a gorgeous LCD.
Um, what about the 51-point AF system? In-camera time lapse capture without use of a computer? Obviously some features won't matter to you, but you can use the side-by-side comparison at DPReview to get a general idea of each camera's feature set.

Quote:
as high ISO is important for me.
It's important to me too, but I still use a D2H. Seen that thing at high ISO before? =)
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is online now   Reply With Quote