View Single Post
Old 09-08-2007   #441 (permalink)
cyclohexane
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,147
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1065
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Understanding Exposure

Quote:
It seems to me that by underexposing by one stop the range of detail from highlight to shadow would be greater.
Highlights, yes, but your shadows get noisy, and a full stop of underexposure means that the shadow noise will creep into your midtones. As always, you gain some and you lose some. Take your pick. Personally, I'll take the clean midtones.

Expose to the right usually involves keeping the highlights in, but if you're printing on newsprint your highlights and shadows go anyways, so we typically just expose for our subjects and/or desired effect and let everything else fall where it does; usually it looks fine on print and on the web.


__________________
Members don't see ads in threads. Register your free account today and become a member on PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Forum, gaining access to posting privileges, contests, free plug-ins and other downloads, unlimited online storage for your photographs, reviews, free marketplace listings, and much more.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is offline   Reply With Quote