Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidebyte
I never see Olympus being #1 or #2 but that is of no consequence. If they are profitable, then they have met their target. It's only the "outsiders" looking in that envision #1 or #2. It is my belief that they have NO aspirations to bump heads with C&N but just want to be a reasonably successful company. There is no intelligent reason for them to even try to get in a p!ssin match with a skunk. They have always since their inception been an innovator i.e. live view, dust buster and excellent lenses.
They will continue to be an innovator and with any luck also be profitable.
|
Probably why "they" released a PDF
directly comparing their "coming soon" pro-level DSLR to a Canon model AND a Nikon model?
Making statements like "worlds fastest auto-focusing" or whatever?
And I don't know what is so innovative about releasing a "5 year in the making" pro-level replacement body with an "advanced amateur" sensor inside, either. Oh, but they may tweak the colors or dynamic range. Yippee. Only means those with the E-510 could have it to if they hacked it.
If they patented Live View, the Dust-Busting system, etc., and were making boo-coo profits from others, then that is profit. Does it make their systems better?