Quote:
Originally Posted by yodasarmpit
The subject matter has to be interesting, taking a perfectly executed shot with an uninteresting subject will hold very little interest for the viewer.
A great shot is one that is well taken with a subject that captivates the viewer, in reality you need both to make it a great shot.
|
I understand that part. The question, though, centered around a viewer's opinion of an interesting subject with an average or below average photo, technically speaking.
In other words, if the subject is interesting but the technique isn't very good, why do reviewers tend to think it's a great photo?