Quote:
Originally Posted by kc7dji
very cool.... well I'm not saying that the Mark III is a bad camera. Just for me it doesn't really ring my bell as I probably expected higher MP versus frames per second. I'm primarily a wedding photographer so the 10 frames per second doesn't impress me at all. I'd much rather have a 5d. On the flip side that self cleaning sensor I lust for. I still see the Mark series geared mainly towards the sports photographer. I also wasn't too sure of the real time viewing. I think it takes away from the SLR feel and puts the point-n-shoot feel on a SLR body. Just my opinion.
|
I'd have to agree with Scott's post....but as far as the Live Viewfinder goes, for me, the jury is still out....I can't quite poo-poo it away, and I don't think it is too "P&S" ish...for that matter both P&S cameras and pro DSLR's have lenses, aperture control, and ISO settings....the fact that they both share certain features does not make a pro DSLR P&S'ish...just my 2 cents. Come to think of it, a Live Viewfinder could be great for judging depth-of-field, assuming it works in conjunction with the DOF Preview button....but I'm not sure on this.