View Single Post
Old 02-09-2007   #3 (permalink)
Nikonfreak
F1 Camel
 
Nikonfreak's Avatar
 
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,134
Nikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorNikonfreak strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1178
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Nikon 70-300 VR lower price at B&H

I suspect that the demand for that lens is lower than expected.

The demand for the 18-200 remains incredbily strong. The 70-300 VR, IMO, has received some good reviews and is a decent lens, but that 4.5-5.6 is the questionable aspect.

Could you imagine the demand for a 70-300 f/4 AF-S VR or even 100-300 f/4 AF-S VR? Price it say at $1,100 and you'd have people breaking down the doors to get it.

Julio
__________________
I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of 'taking care' of them. - Thomas Jefferson
Nikonfreak is offline   Reply With Quote