Thread: Sigma 10-20mm..any good for occasional pro use?
View Single Post
Old 01-05-2007   #2 (permalink)
cyclohexane
DONATED
Photocamel Master
 
cyclohexane's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area or Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5,171
cyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armorcyclohexane strides over the forum like a knight in shining armor
CamelKarma: 1296
Editing OK?: Ask first
Default Re: Sigma 10-20mm..any good for occasional pro use?
Go for the 12-24mm f/4 Tokina ($500) if money's an issue. It's equal to the Nikkor in most aspects except for flare performance, and I haven't seen a bad copy of the lens. This is my ultrawide option, and I love it. Feels nicer in hand than the Nikkor too,

The Sigma 10-20mm is a decent lens, but I've yet to handle a copy that's sharp on both sides.
__________________
-Michael
cyclohexane is offline   Reply With Quote