View Single Post
Old 09-03-2006   #9 (permalink)
dvdowns
Dromedary
 
Posts: 1,353
dvdowns has a spectacular aura about
CamelKarma: 31
Default Re: Reviews that suck .

Well you would have to print out the online reviews to use them in the paulS smallest room woyldn't you .
To a degree the pixel peeping can also be annoying when they say that one model is better than another because of a magnifying glass test .
That's why I would like a report that says Model A.) 93.758% image quality Model B.) 93.825% image quality and then maybe list the advantages of each so that people can see that the image quality difference will not be noticed and the features can decide . Instead of a magnified view of the 0.067% difference that makes the one look twice as good as the other .
Even with things like lens reviews , there should be "pros" , " cons " and " also to consider " .
The "Also to consider would be things like weight and perhaps price in some cases because if the "pros " include ' best lens on earth ' , then the weight is not a con , it is something to keep in mind if you are a nerd that can't lift 3kg without complaining .
__________________
Nikon D70 , D50 , 18-70 , 18-200VR , Sigma 10-20 mm ,Tamron 28-200 , 50mm f1.8 .Canon S70 compact Canon G6 compact , metz 45-cl4 , sb600  and nissin 360TW flash .
dvdowns is offline   Reply With Quote